2017
DOI: 10.3390/designs2010002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

General Design Procedure for Free and Open-Source Hardware for Scientific Equipment

Abstract: Distributed digital manufacturing of free and open-source scientific hardware (FOSH) used for scientific experiments has been shown to in general reduce the costs of scientific hardware by 90-99%. In part due to these cost savings, the manufacturing of scientific equipment is beginning to move away from a central paradigm of purchasing proprietary equipment to one in which scientists themselves download open-source designs, fabricate components with digital manufacturing technology, and then assemble the equip… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
62
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(59 reference statements)
2
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study joins several others [21,25,67] and stands as a testament to the effectiveness of open source technology as a hardware development platform. Very few components to this mill were designed from scratch thanks to contributions like D3D [51], RAMPS [55], Marlin [56], and communities, such as OSE and Arduino that provide helpful support groups and openly welcome contributions back to their library of work.…”
Section: Open Source As Development Platformmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study joins several others [21,25,67] and stands as a testament to the effectiveness of open source technology as a hardware development platform. Very few components to this mill were designed from scratch thanks to contributions like D3D [51], RAMPS [55], Marlin [56], and communities, such as OSE and Arduino that provide helpful support groups and openly welcome contributions back to their library of work.…”
Section: Open Source As Development Platformmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Very few components to this mill were designed from scratch thanks to contributions like D3D [51], RAMPS [55], Marlin [56], and communities, such as OSE and Arduino that provide helpful support groups and openly welcome contributions back to their library of work. Open source is typically modular and scalable, which maximizes its potential applications [67]. Because of open source emphasis on DM, this machine was capable of being manufactured with a minimum number of tools, or knowledge of manufacturing Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 13 August 2018 doi:10.20944/preprints201808.0233.v1…”
Section: Open Source As Development Platformmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Any of the OSH licenses can be used in the framework. Oberloier and Pearce () detail formal procedures for designers of OSH.…”
Section: A Framework To Support Osh For Conservationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study attempts to a provide a new low-cost but medium-scale technology for transforming plastic recyclables into usable 3D printing feedstock in the form of granules (or particles). In order to provide a low-cost tool for making polymer feedstock from post-consumer waste this study follows the open-source hardware design paradigm [61,62], which has proven so successful for 3D printing in general. A novel open source waste plastic granulator system is designed, built, and tested for its ability to convert post-consumer waste, 3D printed products, and 3D printer waste into polymer feedstock for recyclebots of FGF/FPF printers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%