2022
DOI: 10.3114/sim.2022.101.06
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genera of phytopathogenic fungi: GOPHY 4

Abstract: This paper is the fourth contribution in the Genera of Phytopathogenic Fungi (GOPHY) series. The series provides morphological descriptions and information about the pathology, distribution, hosts and disease symptoms, as well as DNA barcodes for the taxa covered. Moreover, 12 whole-genome sequences for the type or new species in the treated genera are provided. The fourth paper in the GOPHY series covers 19 genera of phytopathogenic fungi and their relatives, including Ascochyta, Cadophora, Celoporthe, Cercos… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 340 publications
(172 reference statements)
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pathogenicity testing revealed they are both pathogenic to Vitis vinifera. In the multilocus phylogenetic analyses of a comprehensive dataset, including all currently known Cadophora species, all species were well-supported as independent phylogenetic lineages, except for two taxa: Cadophora vinaceae CBS 146263 (Chen et al, 2022), which clustered with strong support with the type isolate of Cadophora ferruginea CBS 146363, and Cadophora sabaouae (Aigoun-Mouhous et al, 2021), which was nested with strong support with the type isolate of Cadophora luteo-olivacea CBS 141.41. Cadophora vinaceae CBS 146263 was described as phylogenetically related to Cadophora ferruginea CBS 146363 with slight differences in culture growth rate and color, and 17 nucleotide differences in their TEF-1a sequences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Pathogenicity testing revealed they are both pathogenic to Vitis vinifera. In the multilocus phylogenetic analyses of a comprehensive dataset, including all currently known Cadophora species, all species were well-supported as independent phylogenetic lineages, except for two taxa: Cadophora vinaceae CBS 146263 (Chen et al, 2022), which clustered with strong support with the type isolate of Cadophora ferruginea CBS 146363, and Cadophora sabaouae (Aigoun-Mouhous et al, 2021), which was nested with strong support with the type isolate of Cadophora luteo-olivacea CBS 141.41. Cadophora vinaceae CBS 146263 was described as phylogenetically related to Cadophora ferruginea CBS 146363 with slight differences in culture growth rate and color, and 17 nucleotide differences in their TEF-1a sequences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In these cases, sequences with high similarity from ex-type and non-type isolates were included for phylogenetic reference utilizing the BLASTn function in NCBI and extensive literature review. Accordingly, relevant reference sequences were retrieved from recent and comprehensive phylogenetic studies for isolates in the genus Cadophora [ (Travadon et al, 2015;Linnakoski et al, 2018;Walsh et al, 2018;Bien and Damm, 2020;Macia-Vicente et al, 2020;Aigoun-Mouhous et al, 2021;Chen et al, 2022;Koukol and Macia-Vicente, 2022); Supplementary Table 2], Cytospora [ (Lawrence et al, 2018a;Pan et al, 2020;Shang et al, 2020;Pan et al, 2021); v. 3.10 (Maddison and Maddison 2016).…”
Section: Fungal Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, both sites rely on ITS -based trees, which are often not detailed enough to provide accurate species placements. Recently, the Phytophthora genus was included in the fourth edition of the “Genera of phytopathogenic fungi” series (GOPHY4) (70). This included a whole genus tree of 192 species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2000, a phylogeny of 50 Phytophthora species was developed by Cooke and colleagues based on ITS sequence data [ 25 ]. Since then, expanded phylogenies with additional species and loci have been developed as both the genus and sequencing resources have grown [ 14 , 26 31 ]. Yang and colleagues presented a robust phylogeny for the genus, including many newly described species and isolates that have since been described as individual species [ 14 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%