2010
DOI: 10.1101/gad.1881010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gene-specific repression of the p53 target gene PUMA via intragenic CTCF–Cohesin binding

Abstract: The p53 transcriptional program orchestrates alternative responses to stress, including cell cycle arrest and apoptosis, but the mechanism of cell fate choice upon p53 activation is not fully understood. Here we report that PUMA (p53 up-regulated modulator of apoptosis), a key mediator of p53-dependent cell death, is regulated by a noncanonical, gene-specific mechanism. Using chromatin immunoprecipitation assays, we found that the first half of the PUMA locus (~6 kb) is constitutively occupied by RNA polymeras… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
90
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
8
90
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This data also suggests that the position of CTCF binding relative to the transcription start site may greatly influence its role in the transcriptional process. Our data indicates proximal promoter bound CTCF acts as an activator of initiation, whereas other reports have demonstrated CTCF bound within exonic regions acts as a negative regulator of transcription through enhanced pausing (9,45). Because of the link between TFII-I and genes involved in metabolism, we wanted to test TFII-I KD cells for an altered response to nutrient deprivation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This data also suggests that the position of CTCF binding relative to the transcription start site may greatly influence its role in the transcriptional process. Our data indicates proximal promoter bound CTCF acts as an activator of initiation, whereas other reports have demonstrated CTCF bound within exonic regions acts as a negative regulator of transcription through enhanced pausing (9,45). Because of the link between TFII-I and genes involved in metabolism, we wanted to test TFII-I KD cells for an altered response to nutrient deprivation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Previous analyses of the kinetics of p21 transcriptional activation suggest that histone acetylation is induced following a multitude of genotoxic stresses, but that histone acetylation alone is not sufficient to promote transcriptional elongation by poised Pol II. [49][50][51] This suggests that acetylation of A2066 (Sigma Aldrich), p14 ARF DCS-241 (Santa Cruz), p300 N-15 (Santa Cruz), CBP A-22 (Santa Cruz). When used, image brightness and contrast processing (ImageJ) was applied to the entire blot, maintaining linear exposures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, CTCF must be capable of dynamically responding to stresses and mediating stress-induced alteration of chromatin structures. Several stress-related proteins such as PUMA (p53 upregulated modulator of apoptosis) have been reported to be regulated by CTCF (26). However, it is still unclear how CTCF is regulated in response to environmental stresses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%