2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10709-008-9317-z
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gene mapping in the wild with SNPs: guidelines and future directions

Abstract: One of the biggest challenges facing evolutionary biologists is to identify and understand loci that explain fitness variation in natural populations. This review describes how genetic (linkage) mapping with single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers can lead to great progress in this area. Strategies for SNP discovery and SNP genotyping are described and an overview of how to model SNP genotype information in mapping studies is presented. Finally, the opportunity afforded by new generation sequencing and ty… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
137
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 153 publications
(142 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
0
137
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This will, for example, facilitate QTL mapping studies and will increase the quality of outlier-and structure analyses. Massively increasing the number of markers will enable researchers not only to get better precision in population genetic studies (Novembre et al, 2008), QTL and linkage disequilibrium (LD) mapping projects (Slate et al, 2009) and kinship assignments (Santure et al, 2010), but also to pursue topics such as historical demographic patterns, introgression and admixture (Jakobsson et al, 2008).…”
Section: Large-scale Identification and Development Of Molecular Markersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This will, for example, facilitate QTL mapping studies and will increase the quality of outlier-and structure analyses. Massively increasing the number of markers will enable researchers not only to get better precision in population genetic studies (Novembre et al, 2008), QTL and linkage disequilibrium (LD) mapping projects (Slate et al, 2009) and kinship assignments (Santure et al, 2010), but also to pursue topics such as historical demographic patterns, introgression and admixture (Jakobsson et al, 2008).…”
Section: Large-scale Identification and Development Of Molecular Markersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the advent of NGS, the use of SNPs in molecular ecology studies is predicted to expand dramatically. Once identified these markers can be typed in a large number of individuals using a wide variety of platforms (reviewed in Slate et al, 2009). InDel (insertion-deletion) markers can be detected with similar software as the SNPs and they will probably become a popular kind of molecular marker in future population genetic studies, as they are easy and cheap to identify and score (Väli et al, 2008).…”
Section: Large-scale Identification and Development Of Molecular Markersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…have been highlighted as a potential alternative (Anderson & Garza, 2006;Slate et al, 2009). Individually SNPs are less informative than microsatellites because they are less polymorphic (Glaubitz, Rhodes & Dewoody, 2003;Wang, 2006): most SNPs have just two alleles, and their allele frequencies tend to be skewed, resulting in low heterozygosity and information content (Marth et al, 2001).…”
Section: Error and Mutationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Slate et al 2009). Tools developed for genetic conservation of livestock species generally require knowledge of genetic relations (e.g.…”
Section: Relevance Of Genomics For Conserving Genetic Variation In Wimentioning
confidence: 99%