2017
DOI: 10.2527/jas2017.1714
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gene expression profiling reveals candidate genes related to residual feed intake in duodenum of laying ducks1,2

Abstract: Feed represents two-thirds of the total costs of poultry production, especially in developing countries. Improvement in feed efficiency would reduce the amount of feed required for production (growth or laying), the production cost, and the amount of nitrogenous waste. The most commonly used measures for feed efficiency are feed conversion ratio (FCR) and residual feed intake (RFI). As a more suitable indicator assessing feed efficiency, RFI is defined as the difference between observed and expected feed intak… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(46 reference statements)
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As expected, extremely significant differences ( P < 0.01) were observed in the RFI and FCR between the LRFI (-22.70 and 4.64) and HRFI (19.11 and 5.73) groups, respectively. Importantly, no differences were observed in the initial BW, final BW, MBW 0.75 , and ADG between the 2 groups ( P > 0.05), which is in accordance with the results of high- and low-RFI mule ducks ( Drouilhet et al, 2016b ) and laying ducks ( Zeng et al, 2017 ). Interestingly, similar results have been reported for several other farm animals, such as cattle ( Lancaster et al, 2009 ), lambs ( Zhang et al, 2017a ), pigs ( Young et al, 2011 ; Faure et al, 2013 ; Meunier-Salaün et al, 2014 ), rabbits ( Drouilhet et al, 2016a ), and chickens ( Xu et al, 2016 ; Yi et al, 2018 ; Liu et al, 2019 ; Yang et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…As expected, extremely significant differences ( P < 0.01) were observed in the RFI and FCR between the LRFI (-22.70 and 4.64) and HRFI (19.11 and 5.73) groups, respectively. Importantly, no differences were observed in the initial BW, final BW, MBW 0.75 , and ADG between the 2 groups ( P > 0.05), which is in accordance with the results of high- and low-RFI mule ducks ( Drouilhet et al, 2016b ) and laying ducks ( Zeng et al, 2017 ). Interestingly, similar results have been reported for several other farm animals, such as cattle ( Lancaster et al, 2009 ), lambs ( Zhang et al, 2017a ), pigs ( Young et al, 2011 ; Faure et al, 2013 ; Meunier-Salaün et al, 2014 ), rabbits ( Drouilhet et al, 2016a ), and chickens ( Xu et al, 2016 ; Yi et al, 2018 ; Liu et al, 2019 ; Yang et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Herein, birds with low level RFI means consume less feed than predicted and are identified as efficient birds. For the last decades, RFI is being used to measure feed efficiency traits, which has successfully applied to the artificial selection of feed efficiency in mammal [3] and poultry [4]. Besides, RFI is a trait independent of other production traits, and the heritability of RFI is between 0.23 and 0.49 in chickens, these characteristics of RFI make it can be easily incorporated into the multi-trait selection indexes of commercial breeding companies [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well documented that components of lipid metabo- lism, such as triacylglycerol transport and lipid accumulation in the liver and duodenum, may be involved in the regulation of RFI in cattle [19]. Recently, a global transcriptome analysis in the duodenum of laying ducks showed that genes involved in lipid metabolism play an important role in regulating feed efficiency [20]. Moreover, a previous study suggested that lipid metabolism in the liver and lipid absorption in the intestine were two important factors affecting feed efficiency traits [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%