2012
DOI: 10.3852/11-226
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gene expression profiling of the plant pathogenic basidiomycetous fungus Rhizoctonia solani AG 4 reveals putative virulence factors

Abstract: Lakshman, Dilip K.; Alkharoud, Nadim; Roberts, Daniel P.; Natarajan, Savithiry S.; and Mitra, Amitava, "Gene expression profiling of the plant pathogenic basidiomycetous fungus Rhizoctonia solani AG 4 reveals putative virulence factors" (2012

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the resulting differential cDNA In this study, six contigs (3, 4, 6, 7, 32 and 33) representing nearly 37 % of the EST sequences showed no significant similarity to known protein sequences, reflecting the necessity of sequence annotation in fungi. This high frequency of orphan sequences is similar to that observed in previous fungal EST projects (Shim et al 2004;Viaud et al 2005) and is consistent with findings of other fungal EST studies on different plant pathogens (Lakshman et al 2012;Neumann and Dobinson 2003;Trail et al 2003;Viaud et al 2005). However, the lack of similarity of these EST sequences to entries in protein databases could be due to the fact that they might be derived from 5′ and 3′ un-translated regions (UTRs) (Skinner et al 2001).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Thus, the resulting differential cDNA In this study, six contigs (3, 4, 6, 7, 32 and 33) representing nearly 37 % of the EST sequences showed no significant similarity to known protein sequences, reflecting the necessity of sequence annotation in fungi. This high frequency of orphan sequences is similar to that observed in previous fungal EST projects (Shim et al 2004;Viaud et al 2005) and is consistent with findings of other fungal EST studies on different plant pathogens (Lakshman et al 2012;Neumann and Dobinson 2003;Trail et al 2003;Viaud et al 2005). However, the lack of similarity of these EST sequences to entries in protein databases could be due to the fact that they might be derived from 5′ and 3′ un-translated regions (UTRs) (Skinner et al 2001).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Balali and Kowsari (2004) suggest that heterokaryosis could directly influence AG 4 pathogenicity and that isolates which have heterokaryons with genetically diverse nuclei could result in more virulent AG 4 isolates. Other authors have acknowledged that most AG or subgroups of R. solani exhibit a wide range of virulence and genetic diversity, perhaps due to genetic and environmental factors (Farrokhi-Nejad et al 2007;González et al 2012;Lakshman et al 2012;Strausbaugh et al 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significant genomic resources for other AGs of R. solani have also recently become publicly available, formerly being limited to EST libraries of AG1-IA [24] and AG4 [25]. The recent generation of whole genome sequences of R. solani AGs presents new opportunities for comparative genomics between R. solani anastomosis groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%