2008
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-74
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gene expression patterns within cell lines are predictive of chemosensitivity

Abstract: Background: The NCI has undertaken a twenty-year project to characterize compound sensitivity patterns in a selected set of sixty tumor derived cell lines. Previous studies have explored the relationship between compound sensitivity patterns to gene expression, protein expression, and DNA copy number for these same cell lines. A strong correlation between the pattern of expression of a biomarker and sensitivity to a compound could suggest a clinically interesting biological relationship between the two.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The p values were fitted to a-beta-uniform mixture-BUM model to calculate the corresponding false discovery rate (FDR) [ 31 33 ]. FDR <0.2 was considered significant [ 34 ]. To compare protein expression levels across multiple generations, a g-statistic was used [ 35 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The p values were fitted to a-beta-uniform mixture-BUM model to calculate the corresponding false discovery rate (FDR) [ 31 33 ]. FDR <0.2 was considered significant [ 34 ]. To compare protein expression levels across multiple generations, a g-statistic was used [ 35 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is an increasing interest in interfacing the studies on drug cytotoxicity based on the NCI's tumor screening panels with gene expression databases and the mechanisms of drug action, cell sensitivity and resistance [ 8 , 14 ]. These complementary approaches should provide clues about the mechanisms of some molecules, which ultimately can be developed as antitumor agents [ 10 , 14 , 15 ]. Drugs binding noncovalently to DNA have been in cancer treatment since the 60's, and a detailed structural and functional data on these molecules is available [ 4 ], including quantitative data on their binding to DNA as well as the GI 50 determined in the NCI-60 cell lines.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While it is worth characterizing cancer cells to predict chemosensitivity to any particular drug [ 12 ], and to link changes in gene expression to cytotoxicity [ 8 , 13 - 15 ] it is also of utmost importance a deeper understanding of the mechanism of action of drugs, which includes the dissection of forces driving their noncovalent binding to DNA, and to use this information to help in the development of new anti-cancer agents with higher activity [ 9 , 16 , 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To uncover possible interactions between two entities i (ϭ metabolite) and j (ϭ transcript), the Pearson or Spearman's rank correlation coefficient ij has been calculated for each pair within the obtained dataset. The significance of each pair of metabolite and transcript was assessed using the false discovery rate (FDR), according to reported studies (41). Then by eliminating the associations with lower ij pairs (n ϭ 20), we selected the networks that contained only highly significant correlated entities.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%