Abstract:Prior studies demonstrate that a novel genomic test, the gene expression classifier (GEC), could identify a benign gene expression signature in those nodules with indeterminate cytology with a negative predictive value of greater than 95 %. Examine the performance of the AFIRMA gene expression classifier in predicting benign and malignant nodules in patients with cytologically indeterminate nodules. MEDLINE and EMBASE search for studies meeting eligibility criteria between January 1, 2005, and August 30, 2015.… Show more
“…Afirma, a proprietary gene-expression classifier with a high negative predictive value, is designed to identify benign nodules among those with inconclusive results on cytopathological testing. 24,25 Alternatively, next-generation sequencing of a panel of oncogenes and tumor-suppressor genes identifies nodules with mutations that have been associated with thyroid cancer, with high positive and negative predictive values. 26 These two tests appear to reduce the incidence of unnecessary surgery, although their reliability in various clinical-practice settings remains to be established.…”
“…Afirma, a proprietary gene-expression classifier with a high negative predictive value, is designed to identify benign nodules among those with inconclusive results on cytopathological testing. 24,25 Alternatively, next-generation sequencing of a panel of oncogenes and tumor-suppressor genes identifies nodules with mutations that have been associated with thyroid cancer, with high positive and negative predictive values. 26 These two tests appear to reduce the incidence of unnecessary surgery, although their reliability in various clinical-practice settings remains to be established.…”
“…Based on the initial validation studies, Afirma Thyroid FNA Analysis (GEC/GSC) garners strength by targeting genetic signatures and mRNA expression to exclude malignancy . Its high NPV and low PPV were promoted to foster its use as a rule‐out test . Since its release as a novel testing platform, several authors have investigated the utility of Afirma GEC and its performance in clinical practice .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its high NPV and low PPV were promoted to foster its use as a rule‐out test . Since its release as a novel testing platform, several authors have investigated the utility of Afirma GEC and its performance in clinical practice . Single institutional studies and large meta‐analyses of data demonstrated a compelling reduction in the number of unnecessary surgical operations .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A nonoperative approach was deemed as a safe alternative to a diagnostic lobectomy by many clinicians . It has been suggested that Afirma GEC has greatly modified patient care …”
BACKGROUND
The management of thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology is challenging. Recently, molecular testing on fine‐needle aspirates (FNAs) has been advocated to determine whether clinical follow‐up or surgery is warranted for patients. Three different testing platforms were performed on aspirates from our institution (Afirma Thyroid FNA Analysis, RosettaGX Reveal, and Interpace ThyGenX/ThyraMIR). This study compares their diagnostic efficacy.
METHODS
We conducted a retrospective analysis of indeterminate thyroid FNAs with correlating molecular testing over 4 years (2015‐2018). The aspirates included diagnoses of follicular lesion of undetermined significance, follicular neoplasm, or suspicious for malignancy (SM). Based on cases that underwent surgical resection (Afirma, n = 37; Rosetta, n = 19; Interpace, n = 14), we calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for risk of malignancy and neoplasia.
RESULTS
The three tests performed similarly when predicting risk of malignancy. They showed high sensitivity (80‐100%) and NPV (90‐100%) but lower specificity (10‐64%) and PPV (21‐44%). When assessing their value to predict neoplasia, each test had a high PPV (76‐89%) but low NPV (20‐33%). The sensitivity for neoplasm was intermediate to high (50‐93%), and the specificity remained extremely variable (11‐67%).
CONCLUSION
Overall, these molecular platforms performed similarly, displaying high NPV but low to intermediate PPV for malignancy and low NPV but high PPV for neoplasm. The risk of neoplasm is a good index for surgery, and we argue that many of the neoplasms are low‐risk tumors. We endorse conservative treatment with lobectomy for cases that are indeterminate at FNA but suspicious by molecular testing.
“…Designed to lower patient morbidity and the cost of care by decreasing unnecessary surgery for benign thyroid nodules, the majority of studies have demonstrated the utility of the Afirma GEC, whereas others have questioned the actual cost‐benefit analysis of reflexively incorporating it into clinical care . Behind some of the various interpretations of the performance of the GEC are the inherent differences in agreement among thyroid cytopathologists .…”
Section: The Development Of Thyroid Molecular Testingmentioning
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.