Microfluidic systems have played a major role in the development of high-throughput cell screening, biological analysis, cell-based biosensors, and tissue engineering because they offer miniaturized systems with reduced use of reagents, short reaction times, increased speed of analysis, potential for parallel operation, and precise control/monitoring of cellular behavior. [1][2][3][4][5] In cell-based microfluidic devices, it is important to capture living cells in predefined locations of the microfluidic channel.[6] In addition, continuous nutrition, oxygen supply, and waste removal through the culture medium must be ensured for long-term cell culture. [7,8] Previous studies have demonstrated immobilization of anchorage-dependent cells within particular regions of a microfluidic channel by utilizing laminar flow, [9,10] prepatterned ligands, [11] addressable microfluidic networks, [12] cell-encapsulating hydrogels, [13][14][15][16] or engraved microwells. [17][18][19] Despite the success of these approaches, there are still potential limitations that restrict the widespread use of these techniques. For example, the patterned regions are restricted to the flow of a laminar stream in laminar flow patterning, while the cell encapsulation inside hydrogels is usually irreversible and compromises cell viability owing to exposure to a toxic photoinitiator and radiation. Cell docking into microwells by exploiting stationary conditions (sedimentation) or a receding meniscus is also an attractive strategy for shear protection because of its simplicity and low-expertise requirements. However, the cells can be flooded in a subsequent analysis and damaged by a laminarly flowing stream, resulting in shear-induced alteration in cell behavior.A critical factor for proper functioning of cell-based microdevices is the minimization of shear stress from a medium flow. [6,8] In microchannels, the medium flows over the adhered or suspending cells while markedly influencing cell growth, cellular function, and viability regardless of the cell type. [20][21][22] This is because hydrodynamic forces acting on the cell surface induce cell deformation and decrease in cell-substrate interactions (for anchorage-dependent cells), thus affecting cellular viability, function, and gene expression. In addition to anchorage-dependent cells, the gene expression of the budding yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, is affected by shear stress.[23]It is therefore desirable to take shear damage into account when designing and fabricating microchannel or bioreactor. [7] This Communication addresses a method of forming bottleshaped, hollow polymeric microstructures inside a microfluidic channel for potential shear-protecting cell reservoirs. In particular, the geometry of the cell container was tailored such that the width of the neck is narrower than that of the bottom, capable of offering diffusive mass transport and stable, noninvasive microenvironment against shear stress. Using these hollow structures as cell-docking containers, yeast cells were captured ...