Gendered Cybersupport: A Thematic Analysis of Two Online Cancer Support Groups

Sullivan, Claire F.

doi:10.1177/1359105303008001446

Cited by 118 publications

(131 citation statements)

References 36 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

125

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…100,103,110,116,134 An additional four studies were identified through reference checks and efforts to locate published literature linked to unpublished work identified through the electronic search. 111,112,135,136 An additional two papers (women only), although individually ineligible, were located as 'linked papers' for two of the original 34 studies, 114,120 giving a total of 38 studies (reported in 44 papers), as shown in Figure 8.…”

Section: Search Outcomementioning

confidence: 99%

“…103 The majority of cancer studies focused on male sex-specific cancers (prostate n = 14, 100,101,109,111,121,125,128,136,[208][209][210]212,213 testicular n = 2 214,216 ), sometimes including comparisons with female cancers (prostate vs. breast n = 4; 100,122,128,212 prostate vs. ovarian n = 1; 136 testicular vs. breast n = 1). 216 The remaining six cancer papers concerned a mixture of cancer types ('any', n = 4), 113,116,207,217 male breast cancer (n = 1) 99 and a comparison across colorectal cancer in men and women, cancer in male and female Chinese patients, and metastatic cancer in women (n = 1).…”

Section: Conditionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The majority of the studies were conducted in the USA (n = 13 studies) 101,110,113,114,123,[128][129][130]136,208,213,217 and the UK (n = 11), 99,100,102,108,112,115,116,128,209,214,216 with the remainder in Australia (n = 5), 109,111,118,210,212 Canada (n = 5) 107,117,120,125,211 and the following: Denmark, 207 France, 218 South Africa 215 and Sweden…”

Section: Countrymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…[99][100][101][102][103][134][135][136][207][208][209][210][211][212][213][214][215][216][217][218] Three studies were reported across multiple papers that were individually eligible for inclusion. [118][119][120][121][124][125][126] An additional two papers that did not meet the eligibility criteria as they had female-only samples are included in the synthesis because they presented data about women that formed the basis of gender comparisons made by the authors of included studies reporting findings from male participants.…”

Section: General Study Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The most common disease area was cancer (n = 22), [99][100][101]107,109,111,116,122,125,128,130,136,[207][208][209][210][212][213][214]216,217 followed by HIV/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) (n = 7), 108,110,117,123,127,129,215 cardiac (n = 4: coronary artery disease n = 1, 134 heart failure n = 1, 135 myocardial infarction n = 2 102,211 ), mental health (n = 2: depression n = 1, 115 depression/anxiety n = 1 112 ), arthritis (n = 1), 118 type 2 diabetes (n = 1) 218 and multiple sclerosis (n = 1). 103 The majority of cancer studies focused on male sex-specific cancers (prostate n = 14, 100,101,109,111,121,125,128,136,[208][209][210]212,213 testicular n = 2 …”

Section: Conditionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

A systematic review and metaethnography to identify how effective, cost-effective, accessible and acceptable self-management support interventions are for men with long-term conditions (SELF-MAN)

Galdas

Darwin

Fell

et al. 2015

Health Serv Deliv Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Health Services and Delivery ResearchISSN 2050-4349 (Print) ISSN 2050-4357 (Online) This journal is a member of and subscribes to the principles of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) (www.publicationethics.org/).Editorial contact: nihredit@southampton.ac.ukThe full HS&DR archive is freely available to view online at www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/hsdr. Print-on-demand copies can be purchased from the report pages of the NIHR Journals Library website: www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk Criteria for inclusion in the Health Services and Delivery Research journalReports are published in Health Services and Delivery Research (HS&DR) if (1) they have resulted from work for the HS&DR programme or programmes which preceded the HS&DR programme, and (2) they are of a sufficiently high scientific quality as assessed by the reviewers and editors. HS&DR programmeThe Health Services and Delivery Research (HS&DR) programme, part of the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), was established to fund a broad range of research. It combines the strengths and contributions of two previous NIHR research programmes: the Health Services Research (HSR) programme and the Service Delivery and Organisation (SDO) programme, which were merged in January 2012.The HS&DR programme aims to produce rigorous and relevant evidence on the quality, access and organisation of health services including costs and outcomes, as well as research on implementation. The programme will enhance the strategic focus on research that matters to the NHS and is keen to support ambitious evaluative research to improve health services.For more information about the HS&DR programme please visit the website: http://www.nets.nihr.ac.uk/programmes/hsdr This reportThe research reported in this issue of the journal was funded by the HS&DR programme or one of its preceding programmes as project number 12/5001/14. The contractual start date was in June 2013. The final report began editorial review in June 2014 and was accepted for publication in December 2014. The authors have been wholly responsible for all data collection, analysis and interpretation, and for writing up their work. The HS&DR editors and production house have tried to ensure the accuracy of the authors' report and would like to thank the reviewers for their constructive comments on the final report document. However, they do not accept liability for damages or losses arising from material published in this report.This report presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR). The views and opinions expressed by authors in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the NHS, the NIHR, NETSCC, the HS&DR programme or the Department of Health. If there are verbatim quotations included in this publication the views and opinions expressed by the interviewees are those of the interviewees and do not necessarily reflect those of the authors, those of the NHS, the NIHR, NETSCC, the HS&DR programme or the Department of Health....

show abstract