Gender Identity Disorders: Current Medical and Social Paradigm and the ICD-11 Innovations

Abstract

Introduction. This article presents a review of current concepts of gender identity under normal and pathological conditions.
 Aim. To analyse the impact of the medical and social paradigm shift for clinical practice.
 Results and discussion. The modern academic literature devoted to gender identity disorders is characterized by a variety of terminology, a shift in emphasis from clinical judgement to a socially beneficial normocentric approach and a relatively few advanced, evidence-based research. There is also a lack of evidence for the gender theory underlying the new approach, which raises serious doubts about the validity of the medical and social paradigm revision. In the same time, the position of Russian psychiatrists remains to be more clinically oriented.
 Conclusion. Patients who declare the desire to reassign their gender have to be assessed by psychiatrists for differential diagnosis to exclude a mental disorder. In such cases, the destigmatization of mental disorders is more critical than the depathologization of gender identity disorders.

Conceptualization and management of personality disorders in Russian psychiatry

“…PD are often considered to be co-occurrent with abnormal sexual behaviour, in particular with gender identity disorders (GID) [76 ▪ ,77]. Russian psychiatrists take a more clinically oriented position in qualifying this kind of disturbance that recognizes differential diagnosis and targets destigmatizing mental healthcare [78 ▪ ]. Individuals with PD and GID were found to have a lack of internalized gender roles at the emotional level along with psychosocial maladjustment [77].…”

Lift the Multiple Veils on Genders Roles in Blue Velvet

“…Most of the studies were focused on two aspects: First, illustrating sexual orientation reflected in Judith Butler's work [1]. Second, exploring dimensions of gender identity disorders [2]. However, "Can one person show diverse gender roles?"…”