2016
DOI: 10.1177/1440783315579527
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender, ethnicity and the division of household labour within heterosexual couples in Australia

Abstract: Women continue to undertake substantially more unpaid labour than men, with the gaps closing if women bring economic resources to the household, spend time in paid work, or both partners hold egalitarian gender-role attitudes. Some attention has been given to how these patterns vary across ethnic groups, but the research is sparse and dominated by US studies. We examine the relationships between gender, ethnicity and housework supply within heterosexual couples in Australia using longitudinal data and individu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One potential limitation of the domestic labour measures is they may not be interpreted in the same way across all ethnic groups. We have no way of assessing this in this study but others have suggested the definition of what constitutes domestic labour may vary across groups making direct comparisons problematic ( Sayer and Fine, 2011 ; Ting et al, 2015 ). A future qualitative study to understand potential differences of interpretation could shed some light on this issue.…”
Section: Data Key Measures and Analysis Approachmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…One potential limitation of the domestic labour measures is they may not be interpreted in the same way across all ethnic groups. We have no way of assessing this in this study but others have suggested the definition of what constitutes domestic labour may vary across groups making direct comparisons problematic ( Sayer and Fine, 2011 ; Ting et al, 2015 ). A future qualitative study to understand potential differences of interpretation could shed some light on this issue.…”
Section: Data Key Measures and Analysis Approachmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…They suggest differences in domestic labour across ethnic groups may be due to cultural differences in how domestic tasks are defined producing variations in egalitarian attitudes and behaviours. Ting et al (2015) compared the time spent on domestic labour across different immigrant and ethnic groups using Australian panel data. While all women spend more time on housework than men, they find significant gender gaps in housework hours by ethnic group that are not explained by observable socio-economic characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, Ting et al (2015), in their examination of the division of household labour, found that not only did Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women do less housework per week than a non-Indigenous Australian-born sample, but also the division of labour was more egalitarian in Indigenous Australian households. The problem for the researchers was that the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander sample in their dataset-the Household Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) survey-is small and groups Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander households into one base category.…”
Section: Five-d Data and The Statistical Indigenementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As McLeod and Yates (2006) argue regarding changes in gender relations, "many theoretical accounts tend to overstate the extent of such processes [of feminist and gender reform, and] neglect the ways in which new forms of gender traditionalism are being reinscribed" (p. 189). Thus, and for example, despite the gender reform progress evident in the availability of broader, higher paid career options for many females, studies such as that of Ting, Perales and Baxter (2015) have found that women in heterosexual couples who take up these options continue to typically spend more time on unpaid housework and nurturance than their male partners (although patterns of labour vary according to ethnicity and class). The possibility and experience that gender equity changes on which we as educators and citizens may like to congratulate ourselves are not as advanced as one would imagine from looking only at departmental policy, is an important subject for feminist and educational research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%