Indigenous Data Sovereignty 2016
DOI: 10.22459/caepr38.11.2016.05
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data politics and Indigenous representation in Australian statistics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
54
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That the “majority of participants had moderate to extreme barriers to employment as measured by the JSCI” was described by PM&C as a “cause of joblessness” in remote communities, even though living in a remote community was, itself, a factor in elevating the JSCI score (PM&C , p. 4). In this way, Indigeneity and residence in Indigenous communities became markers of both group and individual disadvantage and deficiency, justifying additional and more intensive government intervention, at the same time that individual barriers to participation were overlooked (Henman , ch10, Walter ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That the “majority of participants had moderate to extreme barriers to employment as measured by the JSCI” was described by PM&C as a “cause of joblessness” in remote communities, even though living in a remote community was, itself, a factor in elevating the JSCI score (PM&C , p. 4). In this way, Indigeneity and residence in Indigenous communities became markers of both group and individual disadvantage and deficiency, justifying additional and more intensive government intervention, at the same time that individual barriers to participation were overlooked (Henman , ch10, Walter ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Walter (2016) p 80 challenge researchers to reverse the "analytical lens to generate data conceptualized through an Indigenous methodological framework. " By changing the way we re-port and re-present data, we seek to challenge the "deficit data/problematic people" and reframe the data to enable new ways of understanding Indigenous health and well-being (Lovett and Walter, 2016;Walter, 2016).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Inconsistent, inaccurate, and irrelevant data for Indigenous peoples; • External control and ownership of data; • Community mistrust of data resulting from exploitative research and policies; • Lack of external support for data infrastructure and capability; and, • Data that describe Indigenous peoples and lifeways through a deficit lens (Rodriguez-Lonebear 2016, Rainie et al 2017c, Kukutai and Taylor 2016, Walter 2016.…”
Section: Data Dependencymentioning
confidence: 99%