2012
DOI: 10.3917/pope.1201.0123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender Equality in Pensions: What Role for Rights Accrued as a Spouse or a Parent?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Many supposed attributes of cohabitation are cited to account for this difference: cohabitation is a less stable form of union (Osborne et al [2007]; Vanderschelden [2006]); cohabiting couples are less likely to have children (Poortmann & Mills [2012]; Perelli-Harris [2014]); cohabitation entails few legal responsibilities (Perelli-Harris & Gassen [2012]); cohabiting partners demand less of each other and hence their relationships are more egalitarian, for example in the sharing of domestic work (South & Spitze [1994]; Barg & Beblo [2012]; Dominguez-Folgueras [2012]; Bianchi et al [2014]; Kandil & Périvier [2017]); they have fewer tax advantages (Kabatek et al [2014]); a cohabiting partner has less protection in the event of separation (alimony, sharing of common wealth, etc.) or of the death of the other (survivor pension; Bonnet & Hourriez [2012]); they pool their resources less (Heimdal & Houseknecht [2003] [1995] shows that when five categories are specified (married, divorced, separated, widower, never married), a significant increase occurs in the value of the coefficient associated with the variable "married" in comparison to specifications that cover only two categories (i.e., married versus unmarried). All these factors are thought to lead to a less pronounced division of labor (Winkler [1997]; Baxter [2005]; El Lahga & Moreau [2007]).…”
Section: Wage Premiums and Penaltiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many supposed attributes of cohabitation are cited to account for this difference: cohabitation is a less stable form of union (Osborne et al [2007]; Vanderschelden [2006]); cohabiting couples are less likely to have children (Poortmann & Mills [2012]; Perelli-Harris [2014]); cohabitation entails few legal responsibilities (Perelli-Harris & Gassen [2012]); cohabiting partners demand less of each other and hence their relationships are more egalitarian, for example in the sharing of domestic work (South & Spitze [1994]; Barg & Beblo [2012]; Dominguez-Folgueras [2012]; Bianchi et al [2014]; Kandil & Périvier [2017]); they have fewer tax advantages (Kabatek et al [2014]); a cohabiting partner has less protection in the event of separation (alimony, sharing of common wealth, etc.) or of the death of the other (survivor pension; Bonnet & Hourriez [2012]); they pool their resources less (Heimdal & Houseknecht [2003] [1995] shows that when five categories are specified (married, divorced, separated, widower, never married), a significant increase occurs in the value of the coefficient associated with the variable "married" in comparison to specifications that cover only two categories (i.e., married versus unmarried). All these factors are thought to lead to a less pronounced division of labor (Winkler [1997]; Baxter [2005]; El Lahga & Moreau [2007]).…”
Section: Wage Premiums and Penaltiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In France, as in many countries, the idea of extending these types of compensation to unmarried couples has been regularly considered and debated. For instance, the recurrent debate on extending survivors' pension benefits to registered partners or partners in a civil union has taken place in Germany, Great Britain, Finland, Norway and France (Conseil d'Orientation des Retraites [2008]; Bonnet & Hourriez [2012]). Extending spousal alimony has been recently discussed in Quebec, for example, in a recent report (Comité Consultatif sur le Droit de la Famille [2015]) that argues for the generalization of the system of alimony to all parental couples, regardless of their marital status.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Bonnet and Hourriez () argued similarly that two new risks related to women's acquisition of pension rights have recently emerged, in addition to the risk of widowhood: the risk of divorce (or separation) and parental risk (the negative impact of children on women's careers).…”
Section: Theoretical Bases Of Pension Rightsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of them, however, limited their interests to pension rights earned through labor market participation, particularly of those who work full‐time continuously. Criticizing the studies for their unfit approach to analyzing women's social rights, some feminist researchers have, alternatively, suggested considering the “gender dimension” of pensions (Bonnet & Hourriez, ; Ginn & Arber, ; Hutton & Whiteford, ; Leitner, ; Orloff, ,b; Quadagno, ; Sainsbury, ; Scheiwe, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation