Gender Disparities and CEDAW: A Case of Pakistan

Abstract

Matter regarding the political representation of women got the salient position in current era. In sequel of this, many countries focused to enhance participation of women in politics generally. Few of countries incorporated the quota system in their electoral process; others designed laws and policies regarding this concern. In the particular case of Pakistan, it is persistently showed a lenient attitude and easy going approach towards issues of women. Empowerment of women remained dependent on the type of regime, interests and prioritizes of leaders. Democratic policy making process have not adopted for the uplift and empowerment of women.
 This assignment paper describes only 12 clauses of CEDAW[1] which directly relates to social, cultural and political aspects of Pakistan, which became the signatory on Feb 6, 1996. Pakistan’s membership to CEDAW was the result of pressure from women related organizations, few of societal factors and governmental institutions who felt the need of development for women of Pakistan. The main purpose of this convention is to support the member states in bringing the gender equality in their societies. This convention necessitates the member parties for making the mechanism to combat all forms of gender discrimination through constitutional amendments, administrative and legal reforms.

Gender-based implications of the COVID-19 pandemic on household diet diversity and nutritional security in Pakistan

“…Numerous deep-rooted challenges and problems create hurdles in bridging the nutritional gaps between males and females in society. Male dominancy in the society, mobility restrictions, limited access to society's resources, lack of legal protection, lower employment opportunities and exclusion from the decision-making process are a few of those hindrances which affect females politically, socially and economically (Bibi, 2020). Due to the continued prevalence of these issues in society, Pakistan performed poorly in the gender equality index (153 out of 156) in 2020 (World Economic Forum, 2021).…”