2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05613
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender differences online: self-representation and involvement in political communication on Facebook

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Research indicates women's external efficacy, the extent they can influence others and be taken seriously, may be undermined on some platforms (Southern & Harmer, 2019). The experience of what Fox et al (2015) describe as ambient sexism: rebuttals to comments that suggest political engagement is not a women's domain as they lack the competence can undermine their sense of external efficacy and lead them to self-censor (Maximova & Lukyanova, 2020). Equally, public debates about women being intimidated, threatened or discredited can give the impression the online environment is a hostile space for women considering engaging in political discourse (Sobieraj, 2020).…”
Section: External and Internal Efficacymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Research indicates women's external efficacy, the extent they can influence others and be taken seriously, may be undermined on some platforms (Southern & Harmer, 2019). The experience of what Fox et al (2015) describe as ambient sexism: rebuttals to comments that suggest political engagement is not a women's domain as they lack the competence can undermine their sense of external efficacy and lead them to self-censor (Maximova & Lukyanova, 2020). Equally, public debates about women being intimidated, threatened or discredited can give the impression the online environment is a hostile space for women considering engaging in political discourse (Sobieraj, 2020).…”
Section: External and Internal Efficacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies have related this to the nature of discourse on platforms, with open environments (forums, Twitter) often found to be polarised and uncivil (Anderson & Huntington, 2017), whereas on more closed platforms the quality and civility is higher (Rowe, 2015). Given women avoid discussions that lead to interpersonal conflicts or openly hostile interactions (Vochocova et al, 2015;Maximova & Lukyanova, 2020), the perceived character of discourse on a platform may be a mitigating factor (Yamamoto et al, 2020). Trust in the platform, and trust other users will behave respectfully and honestly are both found to be important for facilitating the engagement of women (Song, 2021).…”
Section: Network Size and Platform Affordancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a common pattern in several studies unrelated to politics (Martin and Ford, 2018), so it is likely that this finding reflects general gender differences, such as men's preference for sexual or aggressive humor (Hofmann et al, 2020). Indeed, it has been observed that women prefer less offensive patterns of political behavior online (Maximova and Lukyanova, 2020), and the systematic review by Hofmann et al (2020) concluded that there could be social pressures that discourage women's use of aggressive humor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Research indicates women's external efficacy, the extent they can influence others and be taken seriously, may be undermined on some platforms (Southern & Harmer, 2019). The experience of what Fox et al (2015) describe as ambient sexism: rebuttals to comments that suggest political engagement is not a women's domain as they lack the competence can undermine their sense of external efficacy and lead them to self-censor (Maximova & Lukyanova, 2020). Equally, public debates about women being intimidated, threatened or discredited can give the impression the online environment is a hostile space for women considering engaging in political discourse (Sobieraj, 2020).…”
Section: External and Internal Efficacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies have related this to the nature of discourse on platforms, with open environments (forums, Twitter) often found to be polarised and uncivil (Anderson & Huntington, 2017), whereas on more closed platforms the quality and civility is higher (Rowe, 2015). Given women avoid discussions that lead to interpersonal conflicts or openly hostile interactions (Vochocova et al, 2015;Maximova & Lukyanova, 2020), the perceived character of discourse on a platform may be a mitigating factor (Yamamoto et al, 2020). Trust in the platform, and trust other users will behave respectfully and honestly are both found to be important for facilitating the engagement of women (Song, 2021).…”
Section: Network Size and Platform Affordancesmentioning
confidence: 99%