Gender Differences in Emotional Response: Inconsistency between Experience and Expressivity

Abstract

The present study investigated gender differences in both emotional experience and expressivity. Heart rate (HR) was recorded as an indicator of emotional experience while the participants watched 16 video clips that induced eight types of emotion (sadness, anger, horror, disgust, neutrality, amusement, surprise, and pleasure). We also asked the participants to report valence, arousal, and motivation as indicators of emotional expressivity. Overall, the results revealed gender differences in emotional experience and emotional expressivity. When watching videos that induced anger, amusement, and pleasure, men showed larger decreases in HR, whereas women reported higher levels of arousal. There was no gender difference in HR when the participants watched videos that induced horror and disgust, but women reported lower valence, higher arousal, and stronger avoidance motivation than did men. Finally, no gender difference was observed in sadness or surprise, although there was one exception—women reported higher arousal when watching videos that induced sadness. The findings suggest that, when watching videos that induce an emotional response, men often have more intense emotional experiences, whereas women have higher emotional expressivity, particularly for negative emotions. In addition, gender differences depend on the specific emotion type but not the valence.

Strangers, Friends, and Lovers Show Different Physiological Synchrony in Different Emotional States

“…No significant effects of type of relationship or of the interaction between type of relationship and gender was found. The differences due to gender are expected and can be explained by physiological differences in emotional responses found between men and women in general [37].…”

Gender, Rootedness, Normative Beliefs and Emigration Intentions of Slovak University Students

“…The presence of a higher affiliation motive as well as a higher emotionality have been shown to be negatively related to emigration intentions and were essentially found to be related to the distance to which people were willing to move from their home country (Boneva et al., ; Jokela et al., ). The importance of emotional bonds inhibiting migration has been well‐documented, especially among females (Luxen, ; Deng et al., ). Naturally, this is closely related to family commitments in a broader sense which may, for many practical reasons, also hamper emigration intentions.…”

The human body odor compound androstadienone leads to anger-dependent effects in an emotional Stroop but not dot-probe task using human faces

“…Thus, both men and women seem to be affected with respect to angry faces by AND exposure leading to quicker reactions but unchanged accuracy in men and to an increased accuracy without fastened reactions in women. Former studies point to sex differences regarding the salience of positive and negative emotional stimuli with men reporting anger more often [52], showing stronger emotional experience with angry stimuli than women [53] and displaying larger facilitatory effects to negative emotional primes than women [28]. However, independent of sex, anger stimuli are believed to signal immediate threat [26, 27] and thus possess higher behavioral relevance than e.g.…”