2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.artres.2009.10.186
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender differences in arterial structure and function. Are men really from Mars and women from Venus?

Abstract: Gender difference of cardiovascular disease is one of the most investigated and still unsolved items. Finding an answer to this, may have important implications for understanding the differences between men and women in atherosclerosis and possibly lead to the development of gender-specific treatment for cardiovascular disease.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
2
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(21 reference statements)
2
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Fourth, with respect to gender difference in arterial stiffness, the authors are aware of the controversial reports about this interesting issue [9, 30]. In our study, there were no statistically significant differences in PWV values linked to gender.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 45%
“…Fourth, with respect to gender difference in arterial stiffness, the authors are aware of the controversial reports about this interesting issue [9, 30]. In our study, there were no statistically significant differences in PWV values linked to gender.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 45%
“…34 Gender difference in AS is one of the most controversial and still unsolved issues in CV disease. 12,35 In our study, there was no difference in PWV values linked to gender, in accordance to large population based studies, in which gender difference in PWV was null or had no clinical significance (<0.1 m/s). 24,34,36,37 Moreover, in the framework of the Anglo Cardiff Collaborative Study and Multi Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis, 34 gender had no effect on the stiffness of large arteries and PWV, and Cecelja et al also reported lack of association of PWV and gender.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Gender difference in AS is one of the most controversial and still unsolved issues in CV disease . In our study, there was no difference in PWV values linked to gender, in accordance to large population based studies, in which gender difference in PWV was null or had no clinical significance (<0.1 m/s) .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Existing studies show controversial results with respect to sex‐related differences in cfPWV. Moreover, the influence of sex on AS remains to be defined . Considering the above‐mentioned discrepancies, the need for sex‐specific cfPWV percentiles and RIs obtained in a large healthy Argentinean cohort is evident.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was later demonstrated that hypertension, age, and diabetes mellitus were main determinants of cfPWV . cfPWV is currently considered a predictor of cardiovascular risk and a prognostic marker of all‐cause mortality even for populations of different backgrounds and medical conditions . An increase of one standard deviation in cfPWV represents an increase in mortality and risk of cardiovascular events equivalent to 10 years of aging, or more than 1.5 times the risk determined by increases of 10 mm Hg of systolic blood pressure (SBP) values …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%