1997
DOI: 10.1183/09031936.97.10040822
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender difference in smoking effects on lung function and risk of hospitalization for COPD: results from a Danish longitudinal population study

Abstract: Recent findings suggest that females may be more susceptible than males to the deleterious influence of tobacco smoking in developing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This paper studies the interaction of gender and smoking on development of COPD as assessed by lung function and hospital admission. A total of 13,897 subjects, born after 1920, from two population studies, 9,083 from the Copenhagen City Heart Study (CCHS) and 4,814 from the Glostrup Population Studies (GPS), were followed for 7-16 y… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
17
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 353 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
4
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…From our analyses there is no indication regarding patient characteristics predictive of higher or lower lung density in responses to exacerbations, and further analysis is required to determine if patient baseline parameters are associated with the direction of the lung density variation (i.e., positive or negative). In agreement with the present study, sex differences in lung density, and the rate of its decline, have been previously reported in COPD [24], and lung cancer [25], possibly since the adverse effects of smoking on lung function may affect females to a greater extent than males [26]. Other work has hypothesised that the variation may be due to anatomical differences, with females having more lung tissue per volume than males [27].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…From our analyses there is no indication regarding patient characteristics predictive of higher or lower lung density in responses to exacerbations, and further analysis is required to determine if patient baseline parameters are associated with the direction of the lung density variation (i.e., positive or negative). In agreement with the present study, sex differences in lung density, and the rate of its decline, have been previously reported in COPD [24], and lung cancer [25], possibly since the adverse effects of smoking on lung function may affect females to a greater extent than males [26]. Other work has hypothesised that the variation may be due to anatomical differences, with females having more lung tissue per volume than males [27].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…We observed mortality rates of 11.1%, which was significantly higher in females (19.6%), as compared to males (8.5%). Prescott et al, and Ringbaek et al, in their study, observed that the excess loss of lung function associated with smoking was greater in females than in males and after adjusting for smoking, females had a higher risk of hospital admission, associated co-morbidities, and death due to COPD, than males [ 38 , 39 ]. The reasons for the higher mortality in females are not clear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 Studies have demonstrated an increased effect of smoking on lung function in females, after controlling for smoking intensity. 15,16 In addition, women might be more susceptible to COPD as a result of sex differences in xenobiotic metabolism, hormones that modify detoxifying enzymes, airway inflammation and responsiveness, and particle deposition. 17 COPD causes a huge economic burden.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%