Gender-deviant boys compared with normal and clinical control boys

Bates, John E.; Bentler, Peter M.; Thompson, Spencer K.

doi:10.1007/bf00916535

Cited by 47 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…n Calculated from Bates et al (1979, Berenbaum and Snyder (1995, Figure 2). q Calculated from Slijper (1984 , Table I).…”

Section: Measures For Childrenmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…ContinuedFemininity/Preschool Scale: 1.85 (CAH U.K. girls vs. diabetic control girls) c Femininity/Preschool Scale: 0.79 (CAH U.S. girls vs.normal control girls) c Femininity/Preschool Scale: 0.69 (CAH U.S. girls vs. 2.14 (GID boys vs. normal control boys) aBates et al (1979) 1.65 (GID boys vs. clinical control boys) b 3.02 (GID boys vs. normal control boys) b Temperament: Activity level/ExtraversionZucker and Bradley (1995, pp. 189-193) GID boys vs. normal control boys) l Playstyle: 1.56 (GID boys vs. clinical control boys); 1.45 (GID boys vs. normal control boys) l Pasterski (2002) Playmate: 3.04 (Control boys vs. control girls); 1.00 (CAH girls vs. control girls) m Playstyle: 0.67-2.59 (Control boys vs. control girls);.041-1.30 (CAH girls vs. control girls) m…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Measurement of Psychosexual Differentiation

Zucker

2005

Arch Sex Behav

109

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Since the early 1990s, there has been a surge in interest in the study of infants, children, adolescents, and adults with physical intersex conditions or other congenital conditions that affect, among other things, the configuration of the external genitalia. Regarding psychologic evaluation, an important aspect of both short-term and long-term outcome concerns gender differentiation. This article provides an overview of various measures pertaining to gender identity, gender role, and sexual orientation that have been used in assessment studies of samples of either children and adults with gender identity disorder and/or children and adults with various physical intersex conditions. All of the measures have good psychometric quality although some have been studied more systematically than others. It is hoped that this overview will provide a template for the new generation of studies that are looking at both gender development and sexual orientation in people born with physical intersex conditions.

show abstract

“…n Calculated from Bates et al (1979, Berenbaum and Snyder (1995, Figure 2). q Calculated from Slijper (1984 , Table I).…”

Section: Measures For Childrenmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Measurement of Psychosexual Differentiation

Zucker

2005

Arch Sex Behav

109

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Assessment of sex-of-playmate preference has, however, been largely restricted to information provided by parents (e.g., single items on questionnaires or by interview) (e.g., Bates, Bentler, & Thompson, 1979;Green, 1976;Johnson et al, 2004; for an exception, see Fridell, 2001). Thus, there is certainly room for a more comprehensive evaluation of sex-of-playmate preference.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Playmate and Play Style Preferences Structured Interview: A Comparison of Children with Gender Identity Disorder and Controls

et al. 2006

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The present study compared the sex-typed preferences for playmates and play styles in children referred for concerns about their gender identity development (199 boys, 43 girls) with that of controls (96 boys, 38 girls). Each child was administered the Playmate and Play Style Preferences Structured Interview (PPPSI) developed by Alexander and Hines (Alexander, G. M., & Hines, M. (1994). Child Development, 65, 869-879). In the two single dimension conditions (playmates and play styles), the controls significantly preferred same-sex playmates and same-sex play styles whereas the gender-referred children significantly preferred cross-sex playmates and cross-sex play styles. Effect sizes ranged from 1.56-2.78. In the conflict condition (which required a choice between same-sex playmates and cross-sex play styles vs. cross-sex playmates and same-sex play styles), there was a general indication of a hierarchical preference for the preferred play style in the single dimension condition as opposed to the preferred playmate except for the gender-referred boys, who showed an inverted pattern. For the gender-referred group, the PPPSI data were significantly correlated with other measures of sex-typed behavior, providing evidence of predictive validity. The PPPSI also discriminated between probands threshold and subthreshold for the diagnosis of gender identity disorder. The results were discussed in relation to both basic and applied issues in the assessment of sex-typed behavior in children.

show abstract

“…To what extent are these differences due to differences in motor behavior, psychological preferences or gender identities. Bates, Bentler and Thompson (1979) illustrated the androgynous motor behavior of gender divergent boys, but only Green, Neuberg, and Finch (1983) compared the motor behavior of these boys with conventional boys and girls. They concluded that the "feminine" boys occupied an intermediate position in motor behavior, one that was neither distinctly "feminine" nor distinctly "masculine.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Gender divergence in physical education classes

Cardoso

Felipe

Hedegaard

2005

Psic.: Teor. e Pesq.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

-We evaluate a group of students, presumed by their physical education teachers to be gender divergent. This study suggests that PE teachers confuse "gender-divergence" with uncoordinated motor behaviors. This may be because PE classes emphasize motor abilities and coordination and PE teachers may pay particular attention to these characteristics and use them (wrongly) as a criterion for gender divergence. However, the 10 presumed "divergent students" differ from their peers by being more likely to have friends of the opposite sex, interacting with groups of the opposite sex, preferring physical activities typical of the opposite sex, demonstrating less knowledge of sex, preferring interactive rather than collaborative activities and preferring more individual, less complex, less aggressive activities with less body contact.

show abstract

Gender-deviant boys compared with normal and clinical control boys

Cited by 47 publications

References 12 publications

Measurement of Psychosexual Differentiation

Measurement of Psychosexual Differentiation

The Playmate and Play Style Preferences Structured Interview: A Comparison of Children with Gender Identity Disorder and Controls

Gender divergence in physical education classes

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About