2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0740-8188(99)00056-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender and Technological Practice in Electronic Discussion Lists

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding suggests that females in the same-gender groups dominated the synchronous CMC interactions, lending support to the reports that females in the CMC dominate the interactions by producing more discourse of different types, such as lexical or functional discourse (see AbuSeileek and Rabab'ah 2013;Bani Younes 2014). However, this finding contradicts other results that indicate that males dominate online interactions by producing more discourse, i.e., speaking or writing more (see, for instance, Herring 1994; Richardson and French 2000;Shehadeh 1999;Sierpe 2000). Females in the same-gender pair groups (FF) also produced more discourse than males in the same-gender pair groups, which seems consistent with them producing more discourse functions in the mixed-gender groups (FM and MF).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This finding suggests that females in the same-gender groups dominated the synchronous CMC interactions, lending support to the reports that females in the CMC dominate the interactions by producing more discourse of different types, such as lexical or functional discourse (see AbuSeileek and Rabab'ah 2013;Bani Younes 2014). However, this finding contradicts other results that indicate that males dominate online interactions by producing more discourse, i.e., speaking or writing more (see, for instance, Herring 1994; Richardson and French 2000;Shehadeh 1999;Sierpe 2000). Females in the same-gender pair groups (FF) also produced more discourse than males in the same-gender pair groups, which seems consistent with them producing more discourse functions in the mixed-gender groups (FM and MF).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…Moreover, females in both same and mixed-gender groups obtained higher means than males in asking questions, correcting moves, giving explanations, indicating empathy and sympathy, agreeing with or supporting others, and complimenting their partners, which emphasizes females' cooperativeness. This observation might link with the observation that females' style tends to be cooperative and meek and tends to express socioemotional ideas while males' style is argumentative, competitive, authoritative, and non-cooperative (see Herring 1994;Sierpe 2000;Guiller and Durndell 2007;Cameron 2009aCameron , 2009bHayat et al 2017;Pakzadian and Tootkaboni 2018). Thus, such gender differences between males and females may be accounted for in prior gender studies (e.g., Lakoff 1973;Holmes 1992;Al-Shlool 2016) as females produced discourse functions that are less direct and challenging than those produced by males, and they also used more polite words than males.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation