Gender and Race Differences in Faculty Assessment of Tenure Clarity: The Influence of Departmental Relationships and Practices

Abstract

The authors look at how the intersection of gender and race influences pretenure faculty members’ perceptions of the clarity of tenure expectations. The authors also seek to identify potential predictors (assessment of mentoring, relationships with peers, feedback on progress toward tenure, and of fairness in tenure decision making and evaluation) of perceptions of tenure clarity for four intersectionally defined groups, including historically underrepresented minority women (URMW). The authors use an intersectional perspective and the gendered and racialized organizations’ theoretical lens to interpret the results. The data set comes from the Harvard University Collaborative on Academic Careers in Higher Education survey of tenure-track faculty job satisfaction (2011 and 2012). Bivariate results reveal no significant differences in URMW’s perceptions of tenure clarity compared with all other faculty members. However, findings show that compared with white men (WM), URMW are less satisfied with the relationships with peers and with the fairness in the evaluation of their work. Moreover, they are also less likely to agree that mentoring is effective, that tenure decisions are fair, and that messages about tenure are consistent. The multivariate results indicate that the proposed explanatory model does not explain URMW’s perceptions of clarity of tenure expectations as well as it explains white women’s and WM’s perceptions of clarity of tenure expectations.

Identities, academic cultures, and relationship intersections: postsecondary dance educators’ lived experiences pursuing tenure

“…As has been documented in other studies (Lisnic, Zajicek, and Morimoto 2019;Arnold, Crawford, and Khalifa 2016;Perna 2001), the tenure process and work in postsecondary education overall are made more complex and can be more challenging for people who hold less power and whose identities may be treated as a liability in academic culture. For example, multiple texts discuss how the history of tenure in the academy ignores the needs of faculty members who are not white, childless, able-bodied men (Benard, Paik, and Correll 2007;Dolmage 2017;Guarino and Borden 2017;Mamimseishvili and Lee 2018).…”

Gender and innovation through an intersectional lens: Re‐imagining academic entrepreneurship in the United States

“…Additionally, academic systems of evaluation rely on gendered and racialized metrics of success (Bailyn, 2003; M.R. Moore, 2017), with women faculty of color being less likely than white women or men of any racial group to be awarded tenure (Lisnic et al., 2019). In the university context, academic publishing remains valued over patenting (de Melo‐Martín, 2013; Lawton‐Smith et al., 2017).…”

Anti-racist interventions to transform ecology, evolution and conservation biology departments

“…They may even be penalized for engaging in diversity-valuing behaviour and activities by colleagues who perceive these activities as excessive or unimportant 104 . Departments can ensure diverse representation on promotion and tenure committees, evaluate candidates using transparent rubrics, communicate expectations openly and provide mentoring to help candidates meet those expectations, and explicitly recognize contributions to hidden work, including diversity and equity programming, committee work, emotional labour, mentoring and accessibility to undergraduates, all of which are often disproportionately performed by members of under-represented groups 105,106 .…”