2021
DOI: 10.1002/agj2.20875
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender and livestock feed research in developing countries: A review

Abstract: Livestock productivity and the resulting economic benefits for smallholder farmers are constrained by a limited supply of quality feed. Gender influences both the drivers and constraints for feed technology adoption as well as the distribution of benefits from feed technologies; however, research with gender‐disaggregated data related to livestock feed practices and technologies has not previously been systematically collected and analyzed. This review examines the current scope and patterns in the literature … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“… Gender labor division in livestock feeding (results from review of 44 studies by Harris‐Coble et al. [ 2021 ]) …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Gender labor division in livestock feeding (results from review of 44 studies by Harris‐Coble et al. [ 2021 ]) …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is one of the reasons why women farmers are generally less likely to adopt plant varieties than men in their communities (Radovic-Markovićet al, 2020). Similarly, research shows that forage variety improvement pays little attention to gendered differences in trait needs and priorities, gendered constraints to adoption, the gender dynamics that affect such adoption, and the ability of women to benefit from growing the varieties (Balehegn et al, 2020;Harris-Coble et al, 2022;Njuguna-Mungai et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Livestock productivity and the resulting economic benefits for smallholder farmers are constrained by a limited supply of quality feed [4].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%