1986
DOI: 10.1037//0033-2909.100.3.283
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender and helping behavior: A meta-analytic review of the social psychological literature.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Women are often associated with communal traits such as sociability, warmth and relationship orientation, while men are associated with individual traits like competence, independence and achievement orientation (Langford and MacKinnon, 2000). Eagly and Crowley (1986, p. 284) propose that “women are expected to take care of the personal and emotional needs of others, deliver routine forms of personal service, and, more generally, facilitate the progress of others towards their goals”. Thus, men are more likely to anticipate employee brand equity more strongly than women, as they are not subject to gender role expectations for social behaviour.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Women are often associated with communal traits such as sociability, warmth and relationship orientation, while men are associated with individual traits like competence, independence and achievement orientation (Langford and MacKinnon, 2000). Eagly and Crowley (1986, p. 284) propose that “women are expected to take care of the personal and emotional needs of others, deliver routine forms of personal service, and, more generally, facilitate the progress of others towards their goals”. Thus, men are more likely to anticipate employee brand equity more strongly than women, as they are not subject to gender role expectations for social behaviour.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another popular perspective focuses on the socialization of gender roles across cultures. This orientation suggests that micro, macro, and meso system expectations, opportunities, peer pressure, and conditioning influence a person's development of cis-gendered approaches (Eagly & Crowley, 1986;Rose & Rudolph, 2006;Walters & Carpenter, 2017;Pyke & Johnson, 2008).…”
Section: Gender and Empathymentioning
confidence: 99%