Gender Affirmative Action and Management: A Systematic Literature Review on How Diversity and Inclusion Management Affect Gender Equity in Organizations

Abstract

Gender affirmative action (AA) in management remains a controversial topic among scholars, practitioners, and employees. While some individuals may support the use of AA policies as a means of increasing representation of women, others are not supportive at all, further understanding gender AA as an unacceptable violation of merit—even when targeted by it. With the aim of analyzing how scholars have approached the subject, we systematically reviewed 76 published articles (SCOPUS database), covering the extant literature on gender AA and management. Findings indicate a consensus regarding the common antecedents of attitudes towards gender AA with prior experiences with AA and diversity management (DM) (as well as general perceptions of AA). Performance and satisfaction appear as the predominant outcomes. In addition, while investigating the differences among AA, equal employment opportunity (EEO) and diversity management (DM), scholars are mainly focused on the effectiveness of AA as a means of increasing the inclusion of minorities in general. We conclude that despite marginal studies on employees’ attitudes toward gender AA, there is a gap in the literature, particularly an absence of research on the bivalent position of meritocracy (or merit violation) as both an antecedent and outcome of attitudes towards AA, which deserves further scrutiny.

Adaptation Analysis in Students With High Mathematical Ability: Preliminary Work in the Field of Giftedness

“…The results for the diagnosis of giftedness and the general and personal maladjustment dimensions gave values which approached significance, in line with other studies on adaptive processes in students with high intellectual abilities (García-Perales & Almeida, 2019). Finally, there were no significant differences in relation to gender, although that does not obviate the need to track future academic and professional progress (Furtado et al, 2021).…”

Exploring perceived barriers for advancement to leadership positions in healthcare: a thematic synthesis of women's experiences

“…Research suggests that quota schemes, whilst facilitating advancement, can also have some negative outcomes in the short run where that women leaders appointed through such schemes are viewed as less qualified, leading women to devalue their position and capabilities some even view it as an "unacceptable violation of merit" (Furtado et al, 2021). This can feed doubt and uncertainty about suitability for leadership roles.…”

Gender equality in the workplace: A comparative review of USA and African Practices

“…Countries around the world, especially in Africa, can consider adopting government-led initiatives that have proven successful in promoting gender inclusivity. Implementing affirmative action measures, gender quotas, and targeted financial support for women entrepreneurs can accelerate progress (Furtado et al, 2021). Establishing cross-cultural collaborations between U.S. and African organizations can facilitate the exchange of best practices.…”