Gefäßverletzungen während urologischer Operationen

Süss, Jan David; Kranz, Jennifer; Gawenda, M.; Steffens, J.

doi:10.1007/s00120-020-01207-8

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Technological and biomedical advances in surgical techniques have been able to reduce the incidence of 1 Section of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Department of Surgery, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutricion Salvador Zubiran, Mexico City, Mexico 2 Centro de Investigaciones Silvio Zavala, Universidad Modelo de Merida, Mexico 3 Vice Direction of Research and Learning, Hospital Regional de Alta Especialidad de la Peninsula de Yucatan, Merida, Mexico intraoperative vascular complications, but they are still common in tumor resection surgeries. 2,5,6 Furthermore, hemorrhagic complications have been reported as one of the most prevalent, comprising 33-47% of intraoperative cardiac arrests and deaths. 4,6,7 Retroperitoneal oncologic resections may affect vessels such as the aorta or vena cava, increasing the risk of massive bleeding; therefore, planning vascular surgeon intervention may be an effective preventative measure to reduce incidence of hemorrhagic complications.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Technological and biomedical advances in surgical techniques have been able to reduce the incidence of intraoperative vascular complications, but they are still common in tumor resection surgeries. 2,5,6 Furthermore, hemorrhagic complications have been reported as one of the most prevalent, comprising 33–47% of intraoperative cardiac arrests and deaths. 4,6,7 Retroperitoneal oncologic resections may affect vessels such as the aorta or vena cava, increasing the risk of massive bleeding; therefore, planning vascular surgeon intervention may be an effective preventative measure to reduce incidence of hemorrhagic complications.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Five-year survival after retroperitoneal oncologic resection with and without vascular surgeon intervention

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives Retroperitoneal tumor resection commonly disturbs major vessels; therefore, surgical teams can recruit vascular surgeons to prevent injuries and improve the prognosis of oncologic patients. The objective of the present study is to establish long-term survival after retroperitoneal tumor resection surgery with an emphasis on the potential impact of preventing or repairing major vessel injuries when tumors are adjacent to the aorta or vena cava. Methods Retrospective case series including all cases of surgical removal of retroperitoneal tumors between 2007 and 2020 in a highly specialized hospital in Mexico City. Long-term survival was defined as 5 years after surgical intervention. Descriptive statistics, group-comparison tests, and regression analysis were performed using Stata 16. Results From a total of 70 cases, vascular injury occurred in 30 (42.8%) and the vascular surgeon intervened in 19 (27.1%) of them, 4 (21%) were performed by a vascular surgeon with planned intervention, and in 9 (47.3%) cases the vascular surgeon was called to join the surgery due to emergency. Intraoperative bleeding was 2-fold greater in the group with an emergent participation of vascular surgery in contrast with the planned intervention group (4, 235 mL vs 2, 035 mL, p = 0.04). The regression model revealed a significant association between the intervention of a vascular surgeon and long-term survival (OR 59.3, p = 0.03) after adjusting for sociodemographic and characteristics of oncologic nature. Conclusions Planned intervention of vascular surgeons in retroperitoneal tumor resection may have a positive impact not only in trans-operatory period, but also on long-term survival.

show abstract