Gd–Co–Ge system at 870/1070 K

Морозкин, А.В.

doi:10.1016/j.intermet.2012.03.001

Cited by 21 publications

(18 citation statements)

References 14 publications

(8 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The calculated lattice parameters are given in Table 3 together with the literature values. Literature data for (Ge) solid solution were taken from Morozkin [24]. The calculated values of the lattice parameters from the current study were found to be in a same range as the reported values a=b=c=5.6522 Å [24].…”

Section: Vertical Section Ge-cusbsupporting

confidence: 76%

“…Literature data for (Ge) solid solution were taken from Morozkin [24]. The calculated values of the lattice parameters from the current study were found to be in a same range as the reported values a=b=c=5.6522 Å [24]. The determined lattice parameters for solid solution (Sb) are consistent with data reported by Li et al [25], while the obtained lattice parameters for intermetallic compound η(Cu 2 Sb) from this study were also found to be in the same range as the values a=b=3.97 Å and c=6.06 given by Reshak et al [26].…”

Section: Vertical Section Ge-cusbmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…% and solid solution (Ge) phase is dominant. (1) 5.6522 [24] 4.30724 [25] 3.97 [26] 11.2765(6) 6.0687 (1) 11.2754 [25] 6.06 [26] (5) 5.6522 [24] 4.30724 [25] 3.97 [26] 11.2787 (5) 6.0687 (7) 11.2754 [25] 6.06 [26] …”

Section: Figure 1 Microstructure Of the Sample 5 Analyzed By The Semmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…5.6576 (6) 4.3066 (6) 3.9766 (8) 5.6522 [24] 4.30724 [25] 3.97 [26] 11.2765 (5) 6.0687 (5) 11.2754 [25] 6.06 [26] (2) 4.3057 (6) 3.9756 (2) 5.6522 [24] 4.30724 [25] 3.97 [26] 11.2756 (6) 6.0655 (2) 11.2754 [25] 6.06 [26] (2) 4.3087 (8) 3.9777 (1) 5.6522 [24] 4.30724 [25] 3.97 [26] 11.2786 (6) 6.0656 (3) 11.2754 [25] 6.06 [26] …”

Section: Figure 1 Microstructure Of the Sample 5 Analyzed By The Semmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…5.6534 (7) 4.3098 (5) 3.9788 (3) 5.6522 [24] 4.30724 [25] 3.97 [26] 11.2765 (5) 6.0652 (3) 11.2754 [25] 6.06 [26] …”

Section: Figure 1 Microstructure Of the Sample 5 Analyzed By The Semmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

EFECTS OF CHEMICAL COMPOSITION ON THE MICROSTRUCTURE AND PROPERTIES OF THE CU-Ge-Sb ALLOYS

Gurešić¹,

Đorđević²,

Marković³

et al. 2017

JEPM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the current study a ternary Cu-Ge-Sb system has been experimentally assessed. Chemical and phase compositions of the alloy samples from three vertical sections Cu-GeSb, Ge-CuSb and SbCuGe were studied using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) and confirmed by X-ray diffraction analysis (XRD). Hardness of the alloys was measured byBrinell method while hardness of phases was measured using micro Vickers method. Electrical conductivity of the studied alloys was measured using eddy current instrument. Based on experimentally determined values iso-lines of hardness and electrical conductivity for the whole ternary system were calculated using assumed mathematical models.

show abstract

Section: Vertical Section Ge-cusbsupporting

confidence: 76%

Section: Vertical Section Ge-cusbmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Figure 1 Microstructure Of the Sample 5 Analyzed By The Semmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Figure 1 Microstructure Of the Sample 5 Analyzed By The Semmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…5.6534 (7) 4.3098 (5) 3.9788 (3) 5.6522 [24] 4.30724 [25] 3.97 [26] 11.2765 (5) 6.0652 (3) 11.2754 [25] 6.06 [26] …”

Section: Figure 1 Microstructure Of the Sample 5 Analyzed By The Semmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

EFECTS OF CHEMICAL COMPOSITION ON THE MICROSTRUCTURE AND PROPERTIES OF THE CU-Ge-Sb ALLOYS

Gurešić¹,

Đorđević²,

Marković³

et al. 2017

JEPM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

BSSE‐corrected consistent Gaussian basis sets of triple‐zeta valence quality of the lanthanides La‐Lu for solid‐state calculations

2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Consistent basis sets of triple‐zeta valence quality for the elements La‐Lu were derived for periodic quantum‐chemical solid‐state calculations. They are an extension of the pob‐TZVP‐rev2 [D. Vilela Oliveira, et al., J. Comput. Chem. 2019, 40(27), 2364–2376], [J. Laun and T. Bredow, J. Comput. Chem. 2021, 42(15), 1064–1072], [J. Laun and T. Bredow, J. Comput. Chem. 2022, 43(12), 839–846] basis sets and are based on the fully relativistic effective core potentials of the Stuttgart/Cologne group and on the def2‐TZVP valence basis of the Ahlrichs group. The basis sets are constructed to minimize the basis set superposition error in crystalline systems. The contraction scheme, orbital exponents, and contraction coefficients were optimized in order to ensure robust and stable self‐consistent‐field convergence for a set of compounds and metals. For the applied PW1PW hybrid functional, the average deviations of the calculated lattice constants from experimental references are smaller with pob‐TZV‐rev2 than with standard basis sets available from the CRYSTAL basis set database. After augmentation with single diffuse s‐ and p‐functions, reference plane‐wave band structures of metals can be accurately reproduced.

show abstract

Laser‐Based Additive Manufacturing of WC–Co with High‐Temperature Powder Bed Preheating^†

Fries

Genilke

Wilms

et al. 2020

steel research int.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The field of additive manufacturing (AM), and especially laser powder‐bed fusion (LPBF), is constantly growing. Process windows for a large variety of materials are already developed. Nevertheless, some materials are still difficult to manufacture with LPBF. One of these materials is the tungsten carbide/cobalt‐based hard metal (WC–Co), which is conventionally produced by powder metallurgy including liquid‐phase sintering. Most approaches to manufacture WC–Co with LPBF show a high porosity, undesirable phases in the microstructure, and inhomogeneous carbide distribution. However, the production of WC–Co cutting tools by LPBF will offer some benefits such as production of geometrically optimized inner cooling channels or optimized geometry of the cutting edges. Herein, WC with 17 wt% Co is processed by LPBF with a powder‐bed heating of 900 °C. Afterwards microstructure, density, and hardness are determined. In addition, X‐ray diffraction (XRD) analysis is performed to determine the phase composition. To investigate the edge‐holding properties of LPBF‐manufactured WC–Co cutting tools, stock removal tests are conducted on three different workpiece materials.

show abstract

Gd–Co–Ge system at 870/1070 K

Cited by 21 publications

References 14 publications

EFECTS OF CHEMICAL COMPOSITION ON THE MICROSTRUCTURE AND PROPERTIES OF THE CU-Ge-Sb ALLOYS

EFECTS OF CHEMICAL COMPOSITION ON THE MICROSTRUCTURE AND PROPERTIES OF THE CU-Ge-Sb ALLOYS

BSSE‐corrected consistent Gaussian basis sets of triple‐zeta valence quality of the lanthanides La‐Lu for solid‐state calculations

Laser‐Based Additive Manufacturing of WC–Co with High‐Temperature Powder Bed Preheating^†

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

Gd–Co–Ge system at 870/1070 K

Cited by 21 publications

References 14 publications

EFECTS OF CHEMICAL COMPOSITION ON THE MICROSTRUCTURE AND PROPERTIES OF THE CU-Ge-Sb ALLOYS

EFECTS OF CHEMICAL COMPOSITION ON THE MICROSTRUCTURE AND PROPERTIES OF THE CU-Ge-Sb ALLOYS

BSSE‐corrected consistent Gaussian basis sets of triple‐zeta valence quality of the lanthanides La‐Lu for solid‐state calculations

Laser‐Based Additive Manufacturing of WC–Co with High‐Temperature Powder Bed Preheating†

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

Laser‐Based Additive Manufacturing of WC–Co with High‐Temperature Powder Bed Preheating^†