Gaze vs. Mouse

Lutteroth, Christof; Penkar, Abdul Moiz; Weber, Gerald

doi:10.1145/2807442.2807461

Cited by 52 publications

(21 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For the confirmation phase, the most common eyes-only technique is dwell selection by prolonged fixation of a target [9,16,57], while it is also possible to use eye gestures [32], smooth pursuit if targets are in motion [56], or additional confirmation buttons [25]. Eyes-only techniques need to be based on gaze behaviours that are distinct from natural viewing, and consequently can be experienced as awkward and tiring.…”

Section: Gaze-based Pointing and Selectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Eye&Head

Sidenmark

Gellersen

2019

Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Eye gaze involves the coordination of eye and head movement to acquire gaze targets, but existing approaches to gaze pointing are based on eye-tracking in abstraction from head motion. We propose to leverage the synergetic movement of eye and head, and identify design principles for Eye&Head gaze interaction. We introduce three novel techniques that build on the distinction of head-supported versus eyes-only gaze, to enable dynamic coupling of gaze and pointer, hover interaction, visual exploration around pre-selections, and iterative and fast confirmation of targets. We demonstrate Eye&Head interaction on applications in virtual reality, and evaluate our techniques against baselines in pointing and confirmation studies. Our results show that Eye&Head techniques enable novel gaze behaviours that provide users with more control and flexibility in fast gaze pointing and selection.

show abstract

Section: Gaze-based Pointing and Selectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Eye&Head

Sidenmark

Gellersen

2019

Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…If not, one could assume that a well-established input form, such as a mouse, would be sufficient to achieve a similar or even better result. By doing so, we want to contribute to the research body of comparative studies in the field of gaze vs. mouse (e.g., [49][50][51][52][53][54][55]). left image: in CrossG, players interact via a mouse (look around, pointing) and a keyboard (WASD-movement, crouching); the guidance (i.e., vignette effect) is driven by the current crosshair position that is pinned to the center of the screen, right image: in GazeG, players move in the same way as in CrossG (i.e., mouse and keyboard); in this condition, the guidance is decoupled from the screen's center and is driven via the player's gaze position.…”

Section: Conditionmentioning

confidence: 99%

gEYEded: Subtle and Challenging Gaze-Based Player Guidance in Exploration Games

Lankes

Haslinger

Wolff

2019

MTI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper investigates the effects of gaze-based player guidance on the perceived game experience, performance, and challenge in a first-person exploration game. In contrast to existing research, the proposed approach takes the game context into account by providing players not only with guidance but also granting them an engaging game experience with a focus on exploration. This is achieved by incorporating gaze-sensitive areas that indicate the location of relevant game objects. A comparative study was carried out to validate our concept and to examine if a game supported with a gaze guidance feature triggers a more immersive game experience in comparison to a crosshair guidance version and a solution without any guidance support. In general, our study findings reveal a more positive impact of the gaze-based guidance approach on the experience and performance in comparison to the other two conditions. However, subjects had a similar impression concerning the game challenge in all conditions.

show abstract

“…In spite of the growing amount of development, there are still several factors that impede precision in these systems; for example, a lack of standard for the quality of data obtained by such devices ( Holmqvist et al., 2012 ; Lutteroth et al., 2015 ). Furthermore, and especially relevant, is the correct evaluation of the points of regard, or observer gaze, since this must be predicted precisely to determine the point or button selected.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This technology, which at first glance seems quite simple, takes multiple factors into account before any movement is made. In the first place, the eyes are constantly making small movements to correct their position at all times, even when the person believes that his/her sight is fixed on a point (this concept is called eye-fixation, while the small movements are known as saccades, see discussion in Mrotek and Soechting (2007) and Lutteroth et al. (2015) for more details).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of an eye-pointer interaction device for human-computer interaction

Cáceres

Carrasco

Ríos

2018

Heliyon

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Advances in eye-tracking technology have led to better human-computer interaction, and involve controlling a computer without any kind of physical contact. This research describes the transformation of a commercial eye-tracker for use as an alternative peripheral device in human-computer interactions, implementing a pointer that only needs the eye movements of a user facing a computer screen, thus replacing the need to control the software by hand movements. The experiment was performed with 30 test individuals who used the prototype with a set of educational videogames. The results show that, although most of the test subjects would prefer a mouse to control the pointer, the prototype tested has an empirical precision similar to that of the mouse, either when trying to control its movements or when attempting to click on a point of the screen.

show abstract

Gaze vs. Mouse

Cited by 52 publications

References 27 publications

Eye&Head

Eye&Head

gEYEded: Subtle and Challenging Gaze-Based Player Guidance in Exploration Games

Evaluation of an eye-pointer interaction device for human-computer interaction

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About