1990
DOI: 10.1002/j.1839-4655.1990.tb00884.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gay Men's Knowledge of HIV Transmission and ‘Safe’ Sex: A Question of Accuracy

Abstract: The study described in this paper is part of a project assessing the impact of the HIV epidemic on 535 men who have sex with men. These men were surveyed about their knowledge of HIV, their sexual practices, other issues concerning the transmission of HIV, and AIDS. This paper focuses on these men's beliefs about HIV transmission, their perceptions of the safety of a number of sexual and social practices, and the factors influencing these perceptions. The findings indicate, in general, that the men surveyed we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pioneering efforts in safe-sex education generally wove together this unofficial knowledge with the best scientific knowledge of the time (see Watney, 1989). Areas of ambiguity for lay people are often direct reflections of areas of contention in "official" sources (e.g., epidemiology, medicine, or public health; see Kippax et al, 1990;Myers et al, 1993). Indeed, awareness of gray areas in the demarcation of safe from unsafe may be better interpreted as a sign of sophistication rather than one of ignorance.…”
Section: Boundaries Separating Safe From Unsafementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Pioneering efforts in safe-sex education generally wove together this unofficial knowledge with the best scientific knowledge of the time (see Watney, 1989). Areas of ambiguity for lay people are often direct reflections of areas of contention in "official" sources (e.g., epidemiology, medicine, or public health; see Kippax et al, 1990;Myers et al, 1993). Indeed, awareness of gray areas in the demarcation of safe from unsafe may be better interpreted as a sign of sophistication rather than one of ignorance.…”
Section: Boundaries Separating Safe From Unsafementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kippax et al (1990) found this to be an area of ambiguity among Australian gay men in research conducted as early as 1987. This particular ambiguity is likely exacerbated by national differences in education and prevention programs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Despite the apparent importance of gay men's beliefs about the transmissibility of HIV in sexual behaviours, to our knowledge these beliefs have been investigated directly in only 2 studies 9,10 . These studies did not address several behaviours of considerable interest, however: no data were collected, for example, about the perceived risk of engaging in UAI with a partner repeatedly, rather than just once.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is sigini® cant information on the accuracy of knowledge of HIV/AIDS-related safe and unsafe sexual behaviour within 7 items in studies 17,21 . The test was composed of the 7 items with 4 different levels.…”
Section: Measuring Knowledge About Safe and Unsafe Sexmentioning
confidence: 96%