2017
DOI: 10.1155/2017/9674712
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gaussian Elimination-Based Novel Canonical Correlation Analysis Method for EEG Motion Artifact Removal

Abstract: The motion generated at the capturing time of electro-encephalography (EEG) signal leads to the artifacts, which may reduce the quality of obtained information. Existing artifact removal methods use canonical correlation analysis (CCA) for removing artifacts along with ensemble empirical mode decomposition (EEMD) and wavelet transform (WT). A new approach is proposed to further analyse and improve the filtering performance and reduce the filter computation time under highly noisy environment. This new approach… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To remove large mechanical artifacts, we used artifact subspace reconstruction ( Mullen et al, 2013 ) with a threshold of 20 SDs, which has been used in a previous mobile EEG study ( Artoni et al, 2017 ). We also performed selective low-pass filtering using ensemble empirical mode decomposition ( Wu and Huang, 2009 ; Al-Subari et al, 2015 ) and canonical correlation analysis ( Hotelling, 1936 ), similar to a technique used by Roy et al (2017) . This specifically targeted large high-frequency activity with low autocorrelation, such as muscle activity and line noise ( Safieddine et al, 2012 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To remove large mechanical artifacts, we used artifact subspace reconstruction ( Mullen et al, 2013 ) with a threshold of 20 SDs, which has been used in a previous mobile EEG study ( Artoni et al, 2017 ). We also performed selective low-pass filtering using ensemble empirical mode decomposition ( Wu and Huang, 2009 ; Al-Subari et al, 2015 ) and canonical correlation analysis ( Hotelling, 1936 ), similar to a technique used by Roy et al (2017) . This specifically targeted large high-frequency activity with low autocorrelation, such as muscle activity and line noise ( Safieddine et al, 2012 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ICA and dipole fitting accurately localized 99% of the independent components in non-neural locations. Some authors also propose removal of specific muscular activity such as neck muscle activity that can affect the EEG signal during walking [22,27], by using either ICA or another blind source separation approach called canonical correlation analysis (CCA) [28]. A more general problem remains with analysis in the gamma band since gamma rhythms are generated by small volumes and are thus difficult to record with scalp EEG [29].…”
Section: Methodological Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, we used artifact subspace reconstruction (Mullen et al 2015) with a standard deviation of 20 to remove large artifacts. Next, we developed a high-frequency denoising method based on two emerging signal processing methods: ensemble empirical mode decomposition (EEMD) (Wu and Huang 2009) and canonical correlation analysis (CCA) (Hotelling 1936), which have been combined before (Roy et al 2017). Our EEMD-CCA method performed selective low-pass filtering, specifically targeting large high-frequency activity with low autocorrelation such as muscle activity and line noise.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%