Theory, Modeling, and Field Investigation in Hydrogeology: A Special Volume in Honor of Shlomo P. Neumans 60th Birthday 2000
DOI: 10.1130/0-8137-2348-5.105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gaussian analysis of one-dimensional unsaturated flow in randomly heterogeneous soils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, moment equations are applicable to either mildly heterogeneous or wellcharacterized soils. Unless the use of the Kirchhoff transformation is warranted [36,33,17], they also require linearization of the constitutive relations, K r = K r (h) and h = h(w), in the Richards equation (1). This limits the range of their applicability and introduces modeling errors that cannot be quantified a priori.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, moment equations are applicable to either mildly heterogeneous or wellcharacterized soils. Unless the use of the Kirchhoff transformation is warranted [36,33,17], they also require linearization of the constitutive relations, K r = K r (h) and h = h(w), in the Richards equation (1). This limits the range of their applicability and introduces modeling errors that cannot be quantified a priori.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…An alternative is to assume that a system state, e.g., pressure head w(x, t) in (1), has a Gaussian PDF p w (W; x, t) [1,2]. This approach provides a full probabilistic description of w required for risk assessment-it can be used, for example, to compute Pr½wðx; tÞ 6 W ¼ R W w min p w ðW 0 ; x; tÞdW 0 , the probability of uncertain (random) pressure head w at point x and time t not exceeding a given value W-once its mean wðx; tÞ and variance r 2 w ðx; tÞ are obtained from the corresponding deterministic moment equations [1,2]. Unfortunately, PDFs of w(x, t) are in general non-Gaussian [35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of such ''parametric solutions'' include assumed Gaussian PDF for hydraulic head in steady-state and transient saturated flows (Nachabe and Morel-Seytoux 1995) and pressure in steady-state (Amir and Neuman 2001) and transient (Amir and Neuman 2004) unsaturated flow, and b-distributions for concentration of conservative (Bellin and Tonina 2007) and reactive (Cirpka et al 2008) solutes migrating in groundwater flow. While promising, such approaches are akin to guessing a solution of a differential equation, except the validity of assumed PDFs as solutions of SPDEs cannot be verified by direct substitution and requires, instead, extensive numerical testing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comparison shows excellent agreement between the two sets of results over a remarkably broad range of constitutive parameters. A paper that describes this part of Dr. Amir's work has appeared in the journal (Amir and Neuman, 2001a). An earlier, less complete version has appeared in a book published as a Geological Society of America Special Paper (Amir and Neuman, 2000).…”
Section: Analysis Based On Gaussian Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the last year, Dr. Amir was able to improve substantially the quality of pressure head variance and covariance assessments based on her one-dimensional Gaussian approach. A paper summarizing her most recent work on this topic has been submitted for publication in the journal Transport in Porous Media (Amir and Neuman, 2002b).…”
Section: Extension Of Gaussian Approach To Transient Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%