2010
DOI: 10.1063/1.3309687
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gate voltage dependence of nuclear spin relaxation in an impurity-doped semiconductor quantum well

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Contrary to the case of RDNMR [2,3] and ODNMR [4] where the quadrupolar satellites are clearly split from the central line, no clear-cut splittings but only a broadened structure was observed. This is explained by the difference in the spatial distribution that the signals come from.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 83%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Contrary to the case of RDNMR [2,3] and ODNMR [4] where the quadrupolar satellites are clearly split from the central line, no clear-cut splittings but only a broadened structure was observed. This is explained by the difference in the spatial distribution that the signals come from.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 83%
“…It may be tempting to argue that our strain value is roughly 10 times larger than those detected by RDNMR (14 kHz [2], 18 kHz [3] for both 69 Ga) but rather closer to the 90 kHz [4] [4] to 53 kHz. Thus, it is clarified that the apparent 190 kHz split frequency in our case indicates that the EFG probed by the Al nuclear spins is 54 times greater than the EFG detected by RDNMR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 3 more Smart Citations