1994
DOI: 10.1016/0363-0188(94)90015-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gastrointestinal foreign bodies and strictures: Radiologic interventions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 105 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Physicians should bear in mind that the presence of fish or chicken bones, glass, wood and thin metals cannot be ruled out by plain radiographies. 19 , 23 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 Because false-negative rates with plain film radiographs are as high as 47% in cases of FB suspiction 24 , 29 and 87% in cases of food bolus impaction, 30 even after negative or inconclusive findings on radiographic imaging, every patient with a clinical suspicion of a FB or food bolus impaction should undergo endoscopy. In case of perforation suspicion and for the evaluation of non-radiopaque FB, computed tomography (CT) should be preferred to plain radiographs.…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physicians should bear in mind that the presence of fish or chicken bones, glass, wood and thin metals cannot be ruled out by plain radiographies. 19 , 23 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 Because false-negative rates with plain film radiographs are as high as 47% in cases of FB suspiction 24 , 29 and 87% in cases of food bolus impaction, 30 even after negative or inconclusive findings on radiographic imaging, every patient with a clinical suspicion of a FB or food bolus impaction should undergo endoscopy. In case of perforation suspicion and for the evaluation of non-radiopaque FB, computed tomography (CT) should be preferred to plain radiographs.…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%