2001
DOI: 10.1046/j.1442-2050.2001.00130.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gastroesophageal reflux disease: clinical, endoscopic, and intraluminal esophageal pH monitoring evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When patients with endoscopically proven reflux esophagitis were compared with normal volunteers of similar age, the patients had a higher prevalence of hiatal hernia, larger His angle, shorter LES and abdominal esophageal length, wider opening of the MI‐LES during the relaxation phase, and a thicker distal esophageal wall, especially those with high‐grade reflux esophagitis. These differences have been described in previous investigations . Therefore, our findings confirmed the accuracy of dynamic image analysis using area detector CT for detecting morphological changes of the EGJ in patients with reflux esophagitis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…When patients with endoscopically proven reflux esophagitis were compared with normal volunteers of similar age, the patients had a higher prevalence of hiatal hernia, larger His angle, shorter LES and abdominal esophageal length, wider opening of the MI‐LES during the relaxation phase, and a thicker distal esophageal wall, especially those with high‐grade reflux esophagitis. These differences have been described in previous investigations . Therefore, our findings confirmed the accuracy of dynamic image analysis using area detector CT for detecting morphological changes of the EGJ in patients with reflux esophagitis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%