1979
DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1979.01370270075013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gastric Lymphoma vs Adenocarcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1981
1981
1994
1994

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast the four other reported cases of gastric signet-ring cell lymphoma had Russell body type eosinophilic cytoplasmic inclusions which make them less likely, on H & E examination, to be confused with a signet-ring cell carcinoma (Navas-Palacios et al 1983, Hernandez & Sheehan 1985. The differentiation from the latter is vital since the therapeutic and prognostic implications of the two diagnoses differ widely (Macon 1979, Vernon et al 1979). The so-called 'lympho-epithelial lesion' produced by infiltration and eventual destruction of the glands by malignant follicle centre cells proved a valuable diagnostic feature (Moore & Wright 1984).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast the four other reported cases of gastric signet-ring cell lymphoma had Russell body type eosinophilic cytoplasmic inclusions which make them less likely, on H & E examination, to be confused with a signet-ring cell carcinoma (Navas-Palacios et al 1983, Hernandez & Sheehan 1985. The differentiation from the latter is vital since the therapeutic and prognostic implications of the two diagnoses differ widely (Macon 1979, Vernon et al 1979). The so-called 'lympho-epithelial lesion' produced by infiltration and eventual destruction of the glands by malignant follicle centre cells proved a valuable diagnostic feature (Moore & Wright 1984).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Primary gastric lymphomas represent a small proportion of all stomach malignancies (1-7 %) (Radaszkiewicz & Dragosics 1980) but are an important group of tumours since they behave differently and have a much better prognosis than adenocarcinomas of the stomach. The five year survival rate for lymphoma of the stomach is 20-50 % compared with 10-30 % for adenocarcinoma (Contreary, Nance and Becker, 1980;Macon, 1979). They also have a better prognosis than nodal lymphomas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%