The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2013
DOI: 10.1627/jpi.56.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gasification Rate of Various Biomass Feedstocks in Supercritical Water

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, supercritical water gasification has excellent reactivity, and is a very promising reaction medium for converting various types of biomass into value-added fuel products 4) 12) . Many studies of supercritical water gasification tech-nology have demonstrated the potential of this innovative thermochemical methodology for converting wet biomass and organic waste into combustible gases, such as hydrogen and methane 13), 14) . To investigate the gasification characteristics of various biomass species, a wide range of biomass compounds have been gasified in supercritical water as models of real biomass containing these compounds 15) 30) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, supercritical water gasification has excellent reactivity, and is a very promising reaction medium for converting various types of biomass into value-added fuel products 4) 12) . Many studies of supercritical water gasification tech-nology have demonstrated the potential of this innovative thermochemical methodology for converting wet biomass and organic waste into combustible gases, such as hydrogen and methane 13), 14) . To investigate the gasification characteristics of various biomass species, a wide range of biomass compounds have been gasified in supercritical water as models of real biomass containing these compounds 15) 30) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it was recently reported that the effectiveness of this catalyst differs from feedstock to feedstock. It has been found to be effective for glucoseand cellulose-containing feedstocks, but quite limited for fermentation residue 31) . It is therefore extremely important to find out for which biomass materials the activated carbon catalyst is effective; however, there has so far been no report on a systematic investigation to achieve this.…”
Section: Original Papermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of activated carbon was found to be negligible, indicating that this particular catalyst is not effective for enhancing the supercritical water gasification of glycine. Matsumura et al 31) classified biomass feedstock into three groups in terms of the effect of activated carbon: high cellulose content, low cellulose content, and lignin-containing, among which the low cellulose content group was not affected by the activated carbon catalyst. Glycine does not include cellulose or lignin, and so is most suited to the low (or no) cellulose content group.…”
Section: Effect Of Feedstock Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Supercritical water gasification is suitable for the conversion of wet biomass into hydrogen-rich gas because water is a reaction medium, and thus no drying process is necessary. Furthermore, water is safe, non-toxic, and cheap 6), 7) . Hence, tomato residue in this area can be considered a good feedstock for supercritical water gasification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%