1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0016-2361(98)00014-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gasification of a South Australian low-rank coal with carbon dioxide and steam: kinetics and reactivity studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
151
0
7

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 301 publications
(174 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
15
151
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…It is clear that the gasification rate increases with increased reaction temperature for both reactions and the optimum temperature is 900 °C over the ranges tested; physical operating constraints from the rig meant that it was not possible to operate above this temperature. These results agree with other studies where the temperature effect on different coal chars under CO 2 and H 2 O at atmospheric pressure was investigated and it was found that for the same reaction time (90 min at steady state) the carbon conversion increased with increasing temperature [12][13][14]. The maximum X a was at 0.13.…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is clear that the gasification rate increases with increased reaction temperature for both reactions and the optimum temperature is 900 °C over the ranges tested; physical operating constraints from the rig meant that it was not possible to operate above this temperature. These results agree with other studies where the temperature effect on different coal chars under CO 2 and H 2 O at atmospheric pressure was investigated and it was found that for the same reaction time (90 min at steady state) the carbon conversion increased with increasing temperature [12][13][14]. The maximum X a was at 0.13.…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…This rig consisted of a pressure vessel reactor (10), a carbolite furnace (9), a tar trap (12), a water cooled condenser (13), supplementary gas lines (1) and metering water pump (2). The pressure within the system was governed by a manually operated pressure regulator at the exit of the gas path (14), manually operated pressure regulators on the gas cylinders, a series of computer operated PID mass flow controllers (4), and safety pressure relief valves (7). Pressure levels within the system were monitored with pressure gauges (8), one before and one after the pressure vessel.…”
Section: Experimental Apparatusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shufen and Ruizheng (1994), Ye et al (1998), Harris et al (2006) and Wu et al (2009) have investigated the effect of reaction time on carbon conversion during gasification. Ye et al (1998) investigated that fixed carbon conversion during CO 2 and H 2 O gasification is a function of reaction time and gasification temperature (Fig.…”
Section: Effect Of Reaction Time/residence Time On Coal Gasificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The carbon-sulfur complex is relatively stable, even at 950 C; thus, sulfur cannot be easily removed (Bandosz, 2006). The acidic demineralization of TC is known to reduce the content of activation catalyzers such as Ca and K. Ye et al (1998) showed that the carbon conversion rate is significantly lower when Ca þ K is reduced to <100 mg/kg. This agrees with that indicated by Wu et al (2003), who report that the time taken for coal to be 50% demineralized by HCl increases 2-4-fold when the original K content is <100 mg/kg.…”
Section: Characterization Of the Activated Carbonsmentioning
confidence: 99%