“…In general, these modeling and simulation efforts focus only on some aspects of the GMAW process, while the other aspects of this process are either not considered or their treatment is over simplified. Closer examination of these efforts suggested that they all could be divided into three categories: (a) GMAW models in the first category focus on the dynamics of the electric arc (Ref 10), and on the various aspects of heat and mass transfer from the arc/electrode to the weld pool (e.g., ; (b) within the second category of GMAW models, various aspects of the heat and mass flow within the weld pool (Ref 20-23) as well as the heat transfer across the FZ/HAZ boundaries (including the accompanying FZ solidification process) (e.g., Ref 24,25); and (c) within the third category of the GMAW process models, emphasis is placed on predicting microstructure and property evolution within the FZ and HAZ as a function of the base metal chemistry, initial microstructure of the base metal (typically assumed), initial temperature and flow fields in the weld pool, and the thermal history at various locations within the FZ and HAZ (e.g., Ref 1,2,26,27). As mentioned above, these three categories of GMAW process models neglect the fact that GMAW is a complex process and that its adequate modeling entails a multiphysics (i.e., multi-disciplinary) approach.…”