2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11665-012-0445-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gas Metal Arc Welding Process Modeling and Prediction of Weld Microstructure in MIL A46100 Armor-Grade Martensitic Steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, these modeling and simulation efforts focus only on some aspects of the GMAW process, while the other aspects of this process are either not considered or their treatment is over simplified. Closer examination of these efforts suggested that they all could be divided into three categories: (a) GMAW models in the first category focus on the dynamics of the electric arc (Ref 10), and on the various aspects of heat and mass transfer from the arc/electrode to the weld pool (e.g., ; (b) within the second category of GMAW models, various aspects of the heat and mass flow within the weld pool (Ref 20-23) as well as the heat transfer across the FZ/HAZ boundaries (including the accompanying FZ solidification process) (e.g., Ref 24,25); and (c) within the third category of the GMAW process models, emphasis is placed on predicting microstructure and property evolution within the FZ and HAZ as a function of the base metal chemistry, initial microstructure of the base metal (typically assumed), initial temperature and flow fields in the weld pool, and the thermal history at various locations within the FZ and HAZ (e.g., Ref 1,2,26,27). As mentioned above, these three categories of GMAW process models neglect the fact that GMAW is a complex process and that its adequate modeling entails a multiphysics (i.e., multi-disciplinary) approach.…”
Section: Gmaw Process Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In general, these modeling and simulation efforts focus only on some aspects of the GMAW process, while the other aspects of this process are either not considered or their treatment is over simplified. Closer examination of these efforts suggested that they all could be divided into three categories: (a) GMAW models in the first category focus on the dynamics of the electric arc (Ref 10), and on the various aspects of heat and mass transfer from the arc/electrode to the weld pool (e.g., ; (b) within the second category of GMAW models, various aspects of the heat and mass flow within the weld pool (Ref 20-23) as well as the heat transfer across the FZ/HAZ boundaries (including the accompanying FZ solidification process) (e.g., Ref 24,25); and (c) within the third category of the GMAW process models, emphasis is placed on predicting microstructure and property evolution within the FZ and HAZ as a function of the base metal chemistry, initial microstructure of the base metal (typically assumed), initial temperature and flow fields in the weld pool, and the thermal history at various locations within the FZ and HAZ (e.g., Ref 1,2,26,27). As mentioned above, these three categories of GMAW process models neglect the fact that GMAW is a complex process and that its adequate modeling entails a multiphysics (i.e., multi-disciplinary) approach.…”
Section: Gmaw Process Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These deficiencies of the public-domain GMAW process models have been addressed in our recently developed multiphysics GMAW process model (Ref [1][2][3][4][5]. A brief description of the basic structure of this model and the defining features of its six modules will be provided in section 2.…”
Section: Gmaw Process Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The microstructure of welded joint affects the overall quality and strength of the joint. In this regard, Grujicic et al 16,17 have proposed thermal–mechanical coupled model combined with the physical–metallurgy concepts to predict the distribution of crystalline phases within the as-welded microstructure. This procedure has been applied to the low-carbon steel AISI1005 and high-hardness armor-grade MIL A46100 martensitic steel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%