2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0009-2509(00)00340-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gas holdup in a trayed cold-flow bubble column

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present work, with the decrease in the free area from 23 to 4% there is a maximum increase of 15% in the gas hold-up and for constant free area of 4%, due to a decrease in the number of holes in the sectionalizing plate there is a decrease in the gas hold-up values by 3% at low value of V G equals to 0.062 m s −1 and by 8% at high value of V G equals to 0.295 m s −1 . Kemoun et al [12] has observed similar effect and has reported similar trend. An increased pressure drop (Table 5) across the sectionalizing plates with reduced free area (higher local energy dissipation rate) also contribute to the more efficient bubble break-up, reducing its average size and hence an increase in the gas hold-up.…”
Section: Effect Of % Fa Of the Sectionalizing Platesupporting
confidence: 58%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In the present work, with the decrease in the free area from 23 to 4% there is a maximum increase of 15% in the gas hold-up and for constant free area of 4%, due to a decrease in the number of holes in the sectionalizing plate there is a decrease in the gas hold-up values by 3% at low value of V G equals to 0.062 m s −1 and by 8% at high value of V G equals to 0.295 m s −1 . Kemoun et al [12] has observed similar effect and has reported similar trend. An increased pressure drop (Table 5) across the sectionalizing plates with reduced free area (higher local energy dissipation rate) also contribute to the more efficient bubble break-up, reducing its average size and hence an increase in the gas hold-up.…”
Section: Effect Of % Fa Of the Sectionalizing Platesupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Dreher and Krishna [13] have not reported the clear liquid height (H c ) and hence the present correlation cannot be used to compare their data. The data of Kemoun et al [12] and De [18] could be partially compared with the present correlations but there is quite deviation in the predicted values as the sectionalizing plate of Kemoun et al [12] system has a 10% down comer area and only pipe gas sparger, whereas De [18] has used a single hole sparger and a loosely fitting stack of the sectionalizing plate in the system. Also, operating range of superficial gas velocity is significantly different than used in the present case.…”
Section: Validation Of Correlations On the Basis Of Literature Datamentioning
confidence: 55%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Dreher and Krishna [8] reported an increase in gas cap with increasing superficial gas velocity. Kemoun et al [17] investigated the effect of sieve trays on the time-averaged gas holdup profiles and the overall gas holdup in a cold-flow bubble column using g-ray computed tomography. Doshi and Pandit [10] gave the results of fractional gas holdup in a sectionalized bubble column, and found that the gas cap accumulated by bubbles was formatted below the partition plate.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%