1981
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9673(00)80300-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gas chromatographic determination of water: A source of systematic error introduced by interactions of polar compounds on porous polymer gas chromatographic columns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1982
1982
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of their recommendations have been used in the routine analysis of trace organics in water (4). There are also many suggestions for the GC analysis of trace water in an organic solvent (5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22). However, none of these has been widely accepted in practice, presumably for the following reasons: (1) the Karl Fischer titration method has become a de facto standard method for water content determination, and highly specialized and automated commercial units are readily available, (2) the reliability and accuracy of GC methods have not been well demonstrated for routine applications, (3) some GC methods are complicated and require both specialized personnel and analytical equipment which may not be readily available, and (4) some GC methods are tedious and inefficient and do not have general applicability.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of their recommendations have been used in the routine analysis of trace organics in water (4). There are also many suggestions for the GC analysis of trace water in an organic solvent (5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22). However, none of these has been widely accepted in practice, presumably for the following reasons: (1) the Karl Fischer titration method has become a de facto standard method for water content determination, and highly specialized and automated commercial units are readily available, (2) the reliability and accuracy of GC methods have not been well demonstrated for routine applications, (3) some GC methods are complicated and require both specialized personnel and analytical equipment which may not be readily available, and (4) some GC methods are tedious and inefficient and do not have general applicability.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%