1986
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.33.2114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gap in the spin excitations and magnetization curve of the one-dimensional attractive Hubbard model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
58
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
7
58
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(7) in comparison to those calculated within the exact Bethe-Ansatz equations to obtain more credibility for our parametrization formula. For this purpose, we take the derivative of the ground state energy with respect to the magnetization to calculate the magnetic field in equilibrium condition which is h(n, s, γ) = ∂[nε GS (n, ζ, γ)]/∂s [25]. The magnetization vanishes when the field becomes smaller than the critical value h c , a term associated with the spin energy gap in the attractive case (Note that it vanishes in the repulsive case.).…”
Section: The Model and Its Parametrization Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(7) in comparison to those calculated within the exact Bethe-Ansatz equations to obtain more credibility for our parametrization formula. For this purpose, we take the derivative of the ground state energy with respect to the magnetization to calculate the magnetic field in equilibrium condition which is h(n, s, γ) = ∂[nε GS (n, ζ, γ)]/∂s [25]. The magnetization vanishes when the field becomes smaller than the critical value h c , a term associated with the spin energy gap in the attractive case (Note that it vanishes in the repulsive case.).…”
Section: The Model and Its Parametrization Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A wide variety of models fall into the Luther-Emery universality class and my results should be applicable there in a low-energy sector: Luttinger liquids coupled to phonons and related models so long as they are incommensurate, have wide regions of parameter space with gapped spin fluctuations and gapless charges 31 ; the negative-U Hubbard model at any band-filling has a spin gap 32 , and the positive-U Hubbard model at half-filling has a charge gap 33,34 ; with longer-range interactions, charge gaps can occur at different rational bandfillings, too. The t − J-model has a spin gap at low density 35 .…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ground-state properties of the one-dimensional Hubbard model have been analysed for the case where U < 0 [9][10][11][12][13][14] and U > 0 [15][16][17][18][19] for various n. Some elementary excitations and thermodynamic characteristics, including the specific heat coefficient, have been calculated at finite temperatures [12,[20][21][22]. In the presence of a magnetic field some of the ground-state properties were investigated within the attractive [9][10][11][12] and repulsive Hubbard models [9,12,[17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%