2003
DOI: 10.1108/09526860310470874
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gap analysis of patient meal service perceptions

Abstract: The provision of food and drinks to patients remains a largely unexplored, multidimensional phenomenon. In an attempt to ameliorate this lack of understanding, a survey utilising a modified SERVQUAL instrument measured on a seven‐point Likert scale was carried out on‐site at four NHS acute trusts for the purpose of assessing the perceptions and expectations of meal attributes and their importance in determining patient satisfaction. The results of factor analysis found three dimensions: food properties, interp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With regard to hypothesis 1, the result defined that students' satisfaction with university cafeteria is highly affected by food quality, implying H1 is significant. This finding is positively associated with those of earlier researchers (Hwang et al, 2003;W. G. Kim & H. B. Kim, 2004;Qin & Prybutok, 2009;Raman & Chinniah, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…With regard to hypothesis 1, the result defined that students' satisfaction with university cafeteria is highly affected by food quality, implying H1 is significant. This finding is positively associated with those of earlier researchers (Hwang et al, 2003;W. G. Kim & H. B. Kim, 2004;Qin & Prybutok, 2009;Raman & Chinniah, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The results identified a weak negative correlation between the 2 variables (r = -0.16, n = 189, P = 0.03), with higher age being associated with lower satisfaction with the hospital foodservice. Subjects were divided into 3 age groups (18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40)(41)(42)(43)(44)(45)(46)(47)(48)(49)(50)(51)(52)(53)(54)(55), and 56-65 years). The independent sample t test results indicated no significant difference in scores for males (M = 2.62, SD = 0.74) and females (M = 2.65, SD = 0.77); t (187) = 0-.27, P = 0.79 (two-tailed).…”
Section: Patient Satisfaction According To Various Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,9,20,21 Food quality, meal service, staff issues, and the physical eating environment contribute to patient satisfaction. 9,[20][21][22][23][24][25] One study found that almost half of the food served in hospitals is wasted because of the taste, portion size, patient's appetite, or staff service. 4 Thus, it can be concluded that similar factors affect both satisfaction and plate wastage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unclear staff roles, especially the role of nurses in relation to foodservice, has become a debate. Previously, distributing meals and helping patients eat during meal times were a nurse's responsibility, 22,23 but many hospitals have delegated these duties to ancillary personnel such as kitchen staff. 24,25 During meal times, employees are expected to provide the necessary assistance and monitor the patient's food intake.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%