2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2013.05.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gantry angle-dependent correction of dose detection error due to panel position displacement in IMRT dose verification using EPIDs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These values were comparable with the previous reports on Elekta linacs. 12,25 The EPID sag pattern in the cross-plane showed a leap at around zero gantry angle similar to the one previously observed in Varian linacs. 21,26 This was attributed to the complexity of the mechanical structure of the system that has many junctions and several sliding or bolted mechanical parts.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…These values were comparable with the previous reports on Elekta linacs. 12,25 The EPID sag pattern in the cross-plane showed a leap at around zero gantry angle similar to the one previously observed in Varian linacs. 21,26 This was attributed to the complexity of the mechanical structure of the system that has many junctions and several sliding or bolted mechanical parts.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…As reported by Mijnheer et al , 10 one of the reasons for the limited routine application of IVD is the workload involved in this procedure, and another reason is the confidence of the physicist in quality control methods as the pretreatment tests. 34 36 Nowadays pretreatment tests can identify many potential errors in dose calculation and data transfer, but it is the opinion of the present and other authors 2 that all treatments with curative intent should be verified through IVD measurements, replacing the pretreatment verification with the in vivo EPID dosimetry.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As reported in the literature, [33][34] the comparison between EPID integral images, obtained for each beam, can be used to verify the presence of changes in patient setup, machine output, and leaf behavior during each treatment. 35,36 In this work. for each IMRT beam, the reference 2D-EPID images obtained in the first therapy fraction (In vivo dosimetry section) were used as a surrogate of signals that the EPID should supply if the plan was carried out with high reproducibility.…”
Section: Reconstruction Of D Iso and G-analysismentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The backscatter correction kernel was modeled as a radially symmetric Gaussian and applied to the raw EPID data [ 24 ]. To ensure positioning accuracy during image acquisition, a gantry-angle-dependent correction associated with the panel position displacement was applied [ 25 ]. The EPID displacement was measured by comparing the image acquired at each gantry angle to the 0° image in the 10 cm × 10 cm field.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%