2016
DOI: 10.1177/1533034615590962
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Step-and-Shoot IMRT by Siemens Beams

Abstract: Three radiotherapy centers applied the in vivo dose procedure at 30 clinical intensity-modulated radiotherapy treatments, each one obtained with 5 or 7 beams, and planned for patients undergoing radiotherapy for prostatic tumors. Each treatment beam was checked 5 times, obtaining 900 tests of the ratios R = Diso/Diso,TPS. The average R value was equal to 1.002 ± 0.056 (2 standard deviation), while the mean R value for each patient was well within 5%, once the causes of errors were removed. The γ-analysis of th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first test is representative of the accuracy of the dose reconstructed at a reference point while the second test is the γ -analysis that supplies a transit dosimetry to verify the treatment reproducibility. Both tests supply useful information about the presence of dosimetric errors due to the patient setup, linac output variations, beam interruptions, dose calculations [ 16 , 22 ], and the presence of patient morphological changes [ 3 , 27 ]. The in vivo EPID-based dosimetry workflow applied in this study is shown in Fig 1 .…”
Section: Ivd Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The first test is representative of the accuracy of the dose reconstructed at a reference point while the second test is the γ -analysis that supplies a transit dosimetry to verify the treatment reproducibility. Both tests supply useful information about the presence of dosimetric errors due to the patient setup, linac output variations, beam interruptions, dose calculations [ 16 , 22 ], and the presence of patient morphological changes [ 3 , 27 ]. The in vivo EPID-based dosimetry workflow applied in this study is shown in Fig 1 .…”
Section: Ivd Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this environment, IVD checks are strongly recommended to avoid important dosimetric discrepancies. Several researchers [ 15 , 16 , 17 ] have demonstrated the advantages of reconstructing the delivered dose using an amorphous-silicon electronic portal imaging device (EPID), which presents favourable characteristics such as fast image acquisition and high resolution. In addition, IVD methods are still not widely used due to fear of the increased workload required to implement them [ 7 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… 2 – 6 The in vivo dosimetry (IVD) is strongly recommended by various organizations 7 - 10 so that in some countries, IVD tests are required as a routine check to detect the causes of dosimetric errors. 11 , 12 Several researchers 13 - 35 have implemented IVD systems to reconstruct the delivered dose to the patients using the amorphous silicon electronic portal imaging device (aSi-EPID) associated with the linear accelerator (LINAC). The results showed that aSi-EPIDs can be used to reconstruct the dose in single points, 2 dimensional (2D), and entire 3-dimensional (3-D) dose distribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thirdly, Piermattei et al have focused on calculating the dose at the isocenter point by means of correlation ratios. 16 18 The latter method has the advantage of being of simple implementation but also has the drawback of providing only point dose. In addition to the in-house methods above, there are currently 2 commercial EPID IVD solutions: Dosimetry Check 19 (by Math Resolutions, Columbia, MD) and EPIgray 20 (by DOSIsoft, Cachan, France).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%