As in the study by Wiegell and Wulf, 1 at the 12th week follow-up no difference was noted in the noninflammatory lesions, whereas the count of inflammatory lesions had decreased on average by 66% (range 56-81%). All 16 patients completed the trial.To conclude, we believe that the use of MAL reduced to 4% concentration, together with application of low doses of light, may be useful for controlling the side-effects of PDT in acne and have the same efficacy as the higher concentration but with lower costs. Nevertheless, controlled studies are needed on a larger number of patients in order to determine the most effective therapy capable of balancing good efficacy with reduced side-effects.
References1 Wiegell SR, Wulf HC. Photodynamic therapy of acne vulgaris using methyl aminolaevulinate: a blinded, randomized, controlled trial. Br J Dermatol 2006; 154:969-76. 2 Wiegell SR, Wulf HC. Photodynamic therapy of acne vulgaris using 5-aminolevulinic acid versus methyl aminolevulinate. J Am Acad Dermatol 2006; 54:647-51. 3 Borelli C, Merk K, Plewig G, Degitz K. Light, laser and PDT therapy for acne. Hautarzt 2005; 56:1027-32. 4 Itoh Y, Ninomiya Y, Tajima S, Ishibashi A. Photodynamic therapy of acne vulgaris with topical delta-aminolaevulinic acid and incoherent light in Japanese patients. Br J Dermatol 2001; 144:575-9.