2013
DOI: 10.1049/iet-cta.2012.0635
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Game‐theoretic linear parameter‐varying control with multiple L 2 ‐gain objectives upon energy‐motion regulation of electric bikes propulsion

Abstract: For electric bikes, this work develops linear parameter-varying (LPV) game-theoretic synthesis to regulate the trade-off between energy consumption per distance and propulsion capability in transience. Such a regulation plays like the transmission in transient state, compared to the gear transmission in steady state. Here, the propulsion dynamics is identified with LPV parameterisation that perfectly captures the non-linearity of the dynamics. Incorporation of this LPV plant with per-distance energy-motion per… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 32 publications
(68 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of the abovementioned techniques have been applied to practical systems. Control designs for LPV systems such as missiles, aircrafts and spacecrafts, energy production systems, mechatronic systems, congestion in computernetworks, and web servers [13][14][15][16] have been investigated. The approach of using LPV models has computational advantages over other controller synthesis methods for nonlinear systems because the formulation is close to the linear system counterpart.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the abovementioned techniques have been applied to practical systems. Control designs for LPV systems such as missiles, aircrafts and spacecrafts, energy production systems, mechatronic systems, congestion in computernetworks, and web servers [13][14][15][16] have been investigated. The approach of using LPV models has computational advantages over other controller synthesis methods for nonlinear systems because the formulation is close to the linear system counterpart.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%