Gambling Attitudes and Financial Misreporting

Abstract

We investigate whether attitudes toward gambling help explain the occurrence of intentional misreporting. Similar to gambling, some financial reporting choices involve taking deliberate, speculative risks. We predict that in places where gambling is more socially acceptable, managers will be more likely to take financial reporting risks that increase the likelihood the financial statements will need to be restated. To test this prediction, we exploit geographic variation in local gambling attitudes and find that restatements due to intentional misreporting are more common in areas where gambling is more socially acceptable. This association is even stronger in situations where management is under greater pressure to misreport, including when the firm is close to meeting a performance benchmark, experiencing poor financial performance, or under investment‐related pressure. Furthermore, these results are robust to numerous tests to address omitted variables and endogeneity. Collectively, these findings suggest gambling attitudes help explain the incidence of intentional misreporting.

Criminals, bankruptcy, and cost of debt

“…Our main contribution is to show that the traits of employees can be associated with firm outcomes. One strand of this literature approximates workforce characteristics using demographic variables of people living near firms' headquarters (McGuire et al 2012;Dyreng et al 2012;Call et al 2017;Christensen et al 2018;Beck et al 2018). Our results provide direct evidence, using the traits of actual employees.…”

“…When we re-estimate the regression without NI/TA and NITWO, the untabulated results show that the variable EBITDA/TL is (as expected) negatively related to CoD, and the relation is statistically significant with a p value <0.01. 30 See McGuire et al (2012), Dyreng et al (2012), Call et al (2017), Christensen et al (2018), andBeck et al (2018) 31 This complements the research by Amir et al (2014a) and Law and Mills (2019). 32 See, e.g., Law and Mills (2019) and Honigsberg and Jacob (2021).…”

“…Recent research suggests that employee characteristics also can influence firm behavior. Due to data limitations, researchers use indirect geographic proxies, based on demographic variables of people surrounding a firm's headquarters, including their gambling attitudes (Christensen et al 2018), educational levels (Call et al 2017;Beck et al 2018), or religiosity (McGuire et al 2012Dyreng et al 2012). Other researchers limit their studies to professional services companies for which they can obtain sufficiently detailed data, such as firms in the financial (Law and Mills 2019;Griffin et al 2019;Campbell et al 2019;Bushman et al 2021;Honigsberg and Jacob 2021) or auditing (Amir et al 2014a) industries.…”

Does the "10-Point Water Plan" reduce the intensity of industrial water pollution? Quasi-experimental evidence from China

“…The number of industrial enterprises and the urbanization rate over the years are recorded in the Statistical Yearbook of Chinese Cities. The education level is measured by the proportion of the number of university students in the total population (Christensen et al, 2018). The environmental investment level is expressed by the proportion of environmental infrastructure investment in GDP.…”

CEO cultural heritage and the pricing of audit services

“…A growing stream of research (e.g., Ahmed & Duellman, 2013;Bamber et al, 2010;Bushman et al, 2018;Christensen et al, 2018;Davidson et al, 2019;Dyreng et al, 2010;Law & Mills, 2017) links CEO idiosyncratic personality traits to their firms' accounting choices, financial strategies, and corporate disclosures because CEOs not only directly drive corporate strategies but also set the "tone at the top." In this study, we examine whether auditors, via evidence of audit fees, respond to corporate culture toward risk and uncertainty as inferred from the cultural heritage of the firm's CEO.…”