1960
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3697(60)90239-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Galvanomagnetic properties of semiconductor thin films and surface layers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1961
1961
1984
1984

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We must conclude that there is as yet no evidence for mobility being limited by surface scattering in polycrystalline thin films. Amith (1960) has also shown that the Hall constant should vary with thickness when X,>d but to a much smaller extent than mobility. Again, there appears to be no clear experimental evidence for this in polycrystalline films.…”
Section: Efject Ofjilm Thicknessmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…We must conclude that there is as yet no evidence for mobility being limited by surface scattering in polycrystalline thin films. Amith (1960) has also shown that the Hall constant should vary with thickness when X,>d but to a much smaller extent than mobility. Again, there appears to be no clear experimental evidence for this in polycrystalline films.…”
Section: Efject Ofjilm Thicknessmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, the measured carrier concentrations are surf ace scattering and thickness dependent, just as for the cases of mobility or resistivity, when the number of carriers being scattered from the surf ace is much greater than the number not being scattered. The relationship of this scattering mechanism to the magnitude of the Hall constant has been treated by Amith [37] Zemel ~ al. [21,[38][39][40] compared the relative mobilities for a semiconductor film with a surface space-charge region present both without and with an applied magnetic field.…”
Section: Hall Effect Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. The Hall coefficient correction factor as a function of the ratio of mean surface scattering length to film half-thickness (from Amith[37]). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a treatment sharply increases the density of surface states (Fig. 4b) [16], which, in turn, can bring about a higher degree of diffusivity of surface scattering [17,18] and a larger velocity of intervalley scattering on the surface S. The first factor should bring the observed anisotropy in better agreement with theory calculated with the assumption that the surface scattering is completely diffuse, the second factor can reduce the degree of anisotropy (up to its complete disappearance) owing to the intense intervalley scattering in the SCR layer. The experimentally observed change of K(Y,) a t T = 300 O K proves that such a treatment affects the value of K unconstantially (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%