2009
DOI: 10.1007/s12603-009-0246-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gait speed at usual pace as a predictor of adverse outcomes in community-dwelling older people an International Academy on Nutrition and Aging (IANA) Task Force

Abstract: Although more specific surveys needs to be performed, there is sufficient evidence to state that gait speed identifies autonomous community-dwelling older people at risk of adverse outcomes and can be used as a single-item assessment tool. The assessment at usual pace over 4 meters was the most often used method in literature and might represent a quick, safe, inexpensive and highly reliable instrument to be implemented.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

31
992
8
20

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,502 publications
(1,051 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
31
992
8
20
Order By: Relevance
“…Next, analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was performed in general linear model (GLM) to test the hypothesis that the continuous variables of balance (single-leg stance time), mobility (gait speed and walking index), and physical function (SPPB) were significantly different according to TPPM quintiles. Analogously, multinomial logistic regression analyses were used to test the hypotheses that the proportion of participants who reported perceived balance difficulty, those who reported activity restriction due to fear of falling, those with usual walking speed <0.8 m/s which is the cutoff point identifying mobility-related disability (Abellan van Kan et al 2009), and those who failed the narrow-path walking test would be greater with increasingly worse TPPM quintile. All analyses were performed adjusting for age and sex.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Next, analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was performed in general linear model (GLM) to test the hypothesis that the continuous variables of balance (single-leg stance time), mobility (gait speed and walking index), and physical function (SPPB) were significantly different according to TPPM quintiles. Analogously, multinomial logistic regression analyses were used to test the hypotheses that the proportion of participants who reported perceived balance difficulty, those who reported activity restriction due to fear of falling, those with usual walking speed <0.8 m/s which is the cutoff point identifying mobility-related disability (Abellan van Kan et al 2009), and those who failed the narrow-path walking test would be greater with increasingly worse TPPM quintile. All analyses were performed adjusting for age and sex.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the average usual speed of Q5 was The analyses for single-leg stance, perceived balance difficulty, usual gait speed, walking Index, and SPPB were adjusted for age and sex, and the analyses for fastest gait speed, narrow-path gait speed, and failure on narrow-path test were adjusted for age, sex, and usual gait speed. Finally, as TPPM quintiles were significantly different in maximum grip strength and Blessed Mental test scores, all analyses were further adjusted for these two variables >0.8 m/s which is an indicator of mobility-related disability (Abellan van Kan et al 2009). When the participants were classified using usual walking speed 0.8 m/s as a cutoff, the average TPPM of those with usual walking speed <0.8 m/s was 3.5°.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, walking speed is an important indicator of health status and function and can be used as a 'vital sign' (Fritz and Lusardi 2009;Studenski et al 2011;Taekema et al 2012). It has been shown that walking speed associates with aspects of poor health status or outcomes in older adults, such as mortality (Abellan van Kan et al 2009;Cesari et al 2005;Newman et al 2006;Toots et al 2013), mobility impairment (Newman et al 2006;Purser et al 2005;Rolland et al 2004), falls (Abellan van Kan et al 2009;Montero-Odasso et al 2005), presence of cognitive impairment (Auyeung et al 2008;Camicioli et al 1998), cardiopulmonary diseases (Dumurgier et al 2010;Ilgin et al 2011;Newman et al 2006;Rosano et al 2011), hospitalization, and nursing home placement (van Abellan et al 2009;Cesari et al 2005;Giuliani et al 2008;MonteroOdasso et al 2005). Cut-off values for walking speed are used for the prediction of aforementioned health outcomes and underpin clinical decision making.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Slow gait is a pivotal dimension of physical frailty and is more common in persons with clinical and subclinical disease such as cardiovascular disease and is associated with elevated inflammatory cytokines and body composition Newman et al 2006). In 2009, the International Academy on Nutrition and Aging Task Force concluded that gait speed reliably identifies community-dwelling older people at risk of disability, cognitive impairment, institutionalization, falls, and mortality, and can be used as a single-item assessment tool (Abellan van Kan et al 2009). However, the reasons for the close association between gait speed and morbidity are not well understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%