2008
DOI: 10.1109/tbme.2007.908072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gait Simulation via a 6-DOF Parallel Robot With Iterative Learning Control

Abstract: We have developed a robotic gait simulator (RGS) by leveraging a 6-degree of freedom parallel robot, with the goal of overcoming three significant challenges of gait simulation, including: 1) operating at near physiologically correct velocities; 2) inputting full scale ground reaction forces; and 3) simulating motion in all three planes (sagittal, coronal and transverse). The robot will eventually be employed with cadaveric specimens, but as a means of exploring the capability of the system, we have first used… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Iterative learning control (ILC) is another leading approach, and has exploited the repetitive nature of the rehabilitation process, where patients attempt the same task multiple times in order to promote re-learning. ILC sequentially improves accuracy by using data from previous attempts to adjust the FES supplied during the next execution of the task, and has been successfully used by several groups to assist movement in the lower limb [17], [18], [19], [20]. This paper focuses on the upper limb, and combines inputoutput linearization with a general linear ILC form that has been employed in three sets of clinical trials [21] during which the tracking accuracy provided by ILC translated into statistically significant results across a range of outcome measures [22], [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Iterative learning control (ILC) is another leading approach, and has exploited the repetitive nature of the rehabilitation process, where patients attempt the same task multiple times in order to promote re-learning. ILC sequentially improves accuracy by using data from previous attempts to adjust the FES supplied during the next execution of the task, and has been successfully used by several groups to assist movement in the lower limb [17], [18], [19], [20]. This paper focuses on the upper limb, and combines inputoutput linearization with a general linear ILC form that has been employed in three sets of clinical trials [21] during which the tracking accuracy provided by ILC translated into statistically significant results across a range of outcome measures [22], [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While these simulators are valuable tools in understanding foot bony motion, their accuracy has been affected by the following: non-physiologic ground reaction forces (GRFs) [5], simplified tibial kinematics [5,8,9], low velocity of simulation [8,9], low vertical GRF (vGRF) magnitude [5,8,9], exclusion of bones [9], and technical, rather than anatomical, based coordinate systems [5,8,9]. Our group has developed a cadaveric gait simulator (i.e., the robotic gait simulator or RGS) that has begun to address these issues [10][11][12], with the intent to provide a more accurate and realistic description of foot kinematics during walking. The aim of this work was to provide a description of the bony motion of the foot during gait and present a methodology (the RGS) that addresses many of the limitations associated with dynamic in vitro foot and ankle models of gait.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Force, displacement, and center of pressure (COP) measurements of 9-different foot configurations were tested on a force plate (Kistler Instrument Corp., Amherst, NY) that was mounted to a 6-degree of freedom (DOF) parallel robot (Mikrolar Inc., Hampton, NH) [9]. The test foot was aligned with the force plate such that the pylon was normal to the surface and the foot was at 0 deg of internal-external rotation with respect to the force plate coordinate system when the robot was in its home position (Fig.…”
Section: Angular Stiffness Estimation From Vertical Compressionmentioning
confidence: 99%